Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37937291›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Case Report: Correlation between pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and left-ventricular diastolic pressure during treatment with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Rajat Kalra, Christopher Gaisendrees, Tamas Alexy, Marinos Kosmopoulos, Deborah Jaeger, Georg Schlachtenberger, Ganesh Raveendran, Jason A Bartos, Alejandra Gutierrez Bernal, Ranjit John and 2 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rajat Kalra *Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Christopher Gaisendrees *Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Tamas AlexyCardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Marinos KosmopoulosCardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Deborah JaegerCardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Georg SchlachtenbergerDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ganesh RaveendranCardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jason A BartosCardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Alejandra Gutierrez BernalCardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Ranjit JohnCardiothoracic Surgery Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Thorsten WahlersDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Demetris YannopoulosCardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

Left ventricular physiological effects of veno-arterial ECMO support during cardiogenic shockR01HL160973 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI YANNOPOULOS, DEMETRIS · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL160973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is often used as a surrogate for left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients (LVEDP) who are on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. However, the correlation between PCWP and LVEDP is not clear in the setting of V-A ECMO usage. We sought to evaluate this correlation in this case series. Methods: Patients were referred to our cardiac catheterization laboratory for invasive hemodynamic studies to assess their readiness for VA-ECMO decannulation. All patients underwent simultaneous left and right heart catheterization. Using standard techniques, we measured PCWP and LVEDP simultaneously. Continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile ranges. The correlation between PCWP and LVEDP was evaluated using simple linear regression and reported as Results: Four patients underwent invasive hemodynamic studies 4 (2.5, 7) days after VA-ECMO cannulation. All four patients had suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest and had been put on VA-ECMO. At the baseline level of VA-ECMO flow of 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) L/min, the median LVEDP and PCWP were 6 (4, 7.5) mmHg and 12 (6.5, 16) mmHg, respectively. At the lowest level of VA-ECMO flow of 1.9 (1.6, 2.0) L/min, the median LVEDP and PCWP was 13.5 (8.5, 16) mmHg and 15 (13, 18) mmHg, respectively. There was a poor correlation between the simultaneously measured PCWP and LVEDP ( Conclusions: The PCWP may not correlate well with LVEDP in patients treated with VA-ECMO, particularly at high levels of VA-ECMO support.

Indexed as

ECLS (VA)left ventricular end-diastolic pressureLVEDPPCWPpulmonary capillary wedge pressureVA-ECMO

Identifiers

PMID37937291
PMCPMC10626540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.