ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2023
Innovative approach in assessing the children's immunization status when it cannot be documented.
Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serological responses to killed oral cholera vaccine (OCV) when given 4 years after initial receipt of OCV in Cameroon: A randomized controlled trial.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Uptake of malaria vaccine (RTS,S/AS01) among children aged 6-24 months: A cross-sectional survey conducted in the Western region of Cameroon, 1 year following the vaccine introduction.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During surveys, it is recommended that children immunization status should be based on immunization documents. It has been noted that in some communities, a number of children are claimed to be vaccinated but have no evidence of vaccination. This work is proposed to estimate routine immunization coverage in children based on both documented vaccination and the tracking of undocumented immunization. It was a community-based survey targeting children aged 0-59 months in which the immunization status of children was assessed based on vaccination documents and based on a questionnaire tracking immunization sites and period for children with undocumented vaccination. The vaccination coverage and completeness were estimated from data collected in immunization cards and re-estimated after tracking the immunization status of children with no immunization cards. Of 1435 children reached in households, 1430 (99.7%) were included. Of 1072 children aged 12-59 months, 194 (18.1%) received DPT-Hi+Hb 3 with evidence and 399 (37.2%) with evidence and tracking. In the same age group, the dropout rate from DPT-Hi+Hb 1 (157 doses administered) to DPT-Hi+Hb 3 (127 doses administered) with evidence was 19.1% and 42.4% with evidence and tracking. The tracking of immunization status in children with no evidence of vaccination allows to determine their immunization status and to improve the reliability of the estimated vaccination coverage. This strategy could be adopted to be part of the planning and implementation of vaccination coverage surveys of EPI vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.