ArticleImplementation research and practice
Amplifying consumers as partners in dissemination and implementation science and practice.
Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Patient-Directed Education to Sustain Deprescribing: A Pragmatic Trial.Drugs & aging · 2025Trial
- How is health equity considered in scale-up guidance? A scoping review of process models for scaling public health innovations.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Promoting inclusivity and partnership with recipients of health services: Short report on redesigning Engaging All Voices (previously Consumer Voice).Research square · 2026Article
- Centering communities in policy implementation research: considerations for the integration of community-based participatory research principles into policy-focused implementation science.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Facilitators to the implementation of exercise into cancer care: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Proactive planning for contextual fit: the role of the implementation premortem.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Implementation of Policies That Earmarked Taxes for Behavioral Health.The Milbank quarterly · 2024Article
- What Really Matters in the Implementation of Evidence-based Practices in Community Mental Health? Insight and Recommendations from Experts, Providers, and Clients.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- Engaging With Health Consumers in Scientific Conferences-As Partners not Bystanders.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: This Viewpoint argues for consumers (people with lived experience and their families) to be amplified as key partners in dissemination and implementation science and practice. Method: We contend that consumer opinion and consumer demand can be harnessed to influence practitioners and policymakers. Results: Amplifying consumers' voices can improve the fit of evidence-based interventions to the intended end user. We offer recommendations of frameworks to engage consumers in the dissemination and implementation of health interventions. We discuss the primary types of evidence consumers may rely upon, including testimonials and lived experience. Conclusions: Our intention is for this Viewpoint to continue the momentum in dissemination and implementation science and practice of engaging consumers in our work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.