Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936934›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Candidate regulators of drought stress in tomato revealed by comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses.

Minmin Liu, Gangjun Zhao, Xin Huang, Ting Pan, Wenjie Chen, Mei Qu, Bo Ouyang, Min Yu, Sergey Shabala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GeneCAD: Plant Genome Annotation with a DNA Foundation Model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptomic analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Minmin LiuInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology and Department of Horticulture, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Gangjun ZhaoGuangdong Key Laboratory for New Technology Research of Vegetables, Vegetable Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xin HuangInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology and Department of Horticulture, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Ting PanInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology and Department of Horticulture, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Wenjie ChenInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology and Department of Horticulture, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Mei QuInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology and Department of Horticulture, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Bo OuyangKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Min YuInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology and Department of Horticulture, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Sergey ShabalaInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology and Department of Horticulture, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Foshan University · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is among the most common abiotic constraints of crop growth, development, and productivity. Integrating different omics approaches offers a possibility for deciphering the metabolic pathways and fundamental mechanisms involved in abiotic stress tolerance. Here, we explored the transcriptional and post-transcriptional changes in drought-stressed tomato plants using transcriptomic and proteomic profiles to determine the molecular dynamics of tomato drought stress responses. We identified 22467 genes and 5507 proteins, among which the expression of 3765 genes and 294 proteins was significantly changed under drought stress. Furthermore, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) showed a good correlation (0.743). The results indicated that integrating different omics approaches is promising in exploring the multilayered regulatory mechanisms of plant drought resistance. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analysis identified several GO terms and pathways related to stress resistance, including response to stress, abiotic stimulus, and oxidative stress. The plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) plays pivotal roles in response to drought stress,

Indexed as

ABA-response element binding factorAREB1drought stressheat shock proteinHSPproteomicsRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID37936934
PMCPMC10627169
OpenAlexW4387869053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.