Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936923›Full record

ArticleFASEB bioAdvances2023

From goal to outcome: Analyzing the progression of biomedical sciences PhD careers in a longitudinal study using an expanded taxonomy.

Abigail M Brown, Lindsay C Meyers, Janani Varadarajan, Nicholas J Ward, Jean-Philippe Cartailler, Roger G Chalkley, Kathleen L Gould, Kimberly A Petrie

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB bioAdvances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Coaching-Based Leadership Program for Women Postdoctoral Fellows at the National Cancer Institute that Cultivates Self-confidence and Persistence in STEMM.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abigail M BrownThe Office of Biomedical Research Education and Training Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9504-3465
Lindsay C MeyersThe Office of Biomedical Research Education and Training Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5911-231X
Janani VaradarajanThe Office of Biomedical Research Education and Training Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1262-3905
Nicholas J WardThe Office of Biomedical Research Education and Training Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9718-8447
Jean-Philippe CartaillerCreative Data Solutions Shared Resource, Center for Stem Cell Biology Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0312-2391
Roger G ChalkleyThe Office of Biomedical Research Education and Training Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4965-5473
Kathleen L GouldThe Office of Biomedical Research Education and Training Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3810-4070
Kimberly A PetrieThe Office of Biomedical Research Education and Training Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-962X

Funding

Vanderbilt ASPIRE ProgramDP7OD018423 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CHALKLEY, G. ROGER, GOULD, KATHLEEN L · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
NIH HHS DP7 OD018423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical sciences PhDs pursue a wide range of careers inside and outside academia. However, there is little data regarding how career interests of PhD students relate to the decision to pursue postdoctoral training or to their eventual career outcomes. Here, we present the career goals and career outcomes of 1452 biomedical sciences PhDs who graduated from Vanderbilt University between 1997 and 2021. We categorized careers using an expanded three-tiered taxonomy and flags that delineate key career milestones. We also analyzed career goal changes between matriculation and doctoral defense, and the reasons why students became more- or less-interested in research-intensive faculty careers. We linked students' career goal at doctoral defense to whether they did a postdoc, the duration of time between doctoral defense and the first non-training position, the career area of the first non-training position, and the career area of the job at 10 years after graduation. Finally, we followed individual careers for 10 years after graduation to characterize movement between different career areas over time. We found that most students changed their career goal during graduate school, declining numbers of alumni pursued postdoctoral training, many alumni entered first non-training positions in a different career area than their goal at doctoral defense, and the career area of the first non-training position was a good indicator of the job that alumni held 10 years after graduation. Our findings emphasize that students need a wide range of career development opportunities and career mentoring during graduate school to prepare them for futures in research and research-related professions.

Indexed as

biomedical researchcareer choicePhD trainingpostdoctoralscienceworkforce

Identifiers

PMID37936923
PMCPMC10626162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.