Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2023

Using the RE-AIM framework to assess national teledermatology expansion.

Rebecca P Lamkin, Sara B Peracca, George L Jackson, Aliya C Hines, Allen L Gifford, Olevie Lachica, Donglin Li, Isis J Morris, Marcelo Paiva, Martin A Weinstock and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rebecca P LamkinCenter for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States.
Sara B PeraccaDermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States.
George L JacksonCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham, NC, United States.
Aliya C HinesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Detroit, MI, United States.
Allen L GiffordCenter for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States.
Olevie LachicaDermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Donglin LiCenter for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States.
Isis J MorrisCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham, NC, United States.
Marcelo PaivaCenter for Dermatology, Providence VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States.
Martin A WeinstockCenter for Dermatology, Providence VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States.
Dennis H OhDermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Teledermatology has been utilized in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for decades but continues to have incomplete penetration. VA has funded an initiative to enhance access to dermatology services since 2017 to support asynchronous teledermatology for Veterans living in rural areas. As part of an ongoing evaluation of this program, we assessed the teledermatology activity between the fiscal years 2020 and 2022. We focused on the second cohort of the initiative, comprising six VA facilities and their 54 referral clinics. Methods: We studied teledermatology programs at cohort facilities using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. We used a mixed-methods design including annual online reports completed by participating facilities and VA administrative data. When possible, we compared the data from the 3 years of teledermatology funding with the baseline year prior to the start of funding. Findings: Reach: Compared with the baseline year, there was a 100% increase in encounters and a 62% increase in patients seen at the funded facilities. Over 500 clinicians and support staff members were trained. Effectiveness: In FY 2022, primary or specialty care clinics affiliated with the funded facilities had more dermatology programs than primary or specialty care clinics across the VA (83% vs. 71% of sites). Adoption: By the end of the funding period, teledermatology constituted 16% of dermatology encounters at the funded facilities compared with 12% nationally. This reflected an increase from 9.2% at the funded facilities and 10.3% nationally prior to the funding period. Implementation: The continued funding for staff and equipment facilitated the expansion to rural areas. Maintenance: By the end of the funding period, all facilities indicated that they had fully implemented their program for patients of targeted primary care providers. The Program Sustainability Index scores generally increased during the funding period. Conclusions: Targeted funding to support asynchronous teledermatology implementation for rural Veterans increased its reach, adoption, and implementation, ultimately improving access. Providing program guidance with staffing and training resources can increase the impact of these programs. Ongoing efforts to maintain and increase communication between primary care and dermatology will be needed to sustain success.

Indexed as

asynchronous caredermatologyexpansionimplementation scienceREAIMrural healthteledermatologyVeterans

Identifiers

PMID37936881
PMCPMC10627029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.