ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Building on the Health Policy Analysis Triangle: Elucidation of the Elements.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tracking and appraising maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response implementation in Nigeria: a historical timeline and policy analysis.Reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Health System Integration and Equity in Type 2 Diabetes Prevention: A Comparative Policy Analysis of Seven National Guidelines.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- The Double Burden of Malnutrition in Bangladesh: Policy Architecture, Implementation Realities, and Future Directions.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- A scoping review of the views and experiences of health professionals in the Middle East and North Africa regions regarding social media use.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Review
- Multisectoral collaboration on violence against women and children in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon: A comparative qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Medical brain drain in Nepal: A policy analysis of a deepening health equity crisis.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Policy transmission of "Healthy China 2030" on community health curriculum reform in higher vocational medical education.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Reforming nursing reimbursement: direct payment models under Iran's Nursing Service Act in a global context.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2025Article
- Contentious population policy-making and its consequences: a health policy analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Development and Implementation of Public Policies Addressing Food Systems in Five Sub-Saharan African Countries and Five of Their Cities.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The health policy triangle first presented in the 20th century by Walt and Gilson has been extensively used at local, national, regional, and international levels to assess health policies related to communicable and non-communicable diseases, physical and mental health, antenatal and postnatal care, and human resources, services, and systems. However, the framework lacks intricate details for the four pillars in the triangle viz: 'content,' 'context', 'actors', and 'processes. We propose a checklist of elements to be considered for each pillar; to ease and enhance the process of policy analyses for researchers and policymakers across the globe, including low- and middle-income countries. We suggest using Leichter's categorization of situational, structural, cultural, and environmental factors for comprehensive contextual assessment. Kingdon's multiple streams framework can be applied to determine the 'window of opportunity' allowing the politics, policy, and problem streams to unite, giving birth to the formulation of policies. Lastly, stakeholders' analyses expounding the power, influence, interest, and involvement of intrinsic, extrinsic, implicit, and explicit players should be applied to explore the 'actors' in policy analyses. Robust policy analyses for generating evidence are of paramount importance for policymakers for informed decision-making. Our approach of dis-entangling and elaborating the pillars of the triangle will be helpful for health systems researchers at sub-national, national, regional and global levels to serve as a basis for evidence-based informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.