Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936607›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Differential gradients of immunotherapy vs targeted therapy efficacy according to the sun-exposure pattern of the site of occurrence of primary melanoma: a multicenter prospective cohort study (MelBase).

David Russo, Stéphane Dalle, Olivier Dereure, Laurent Mortier, Sophie Dalac-Rat, Caroline Dutriaux, Marie-Thérèse Leccia, Delphine Legoupil, Henri Montaudié, Eve Maubec and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors as adjuvant treatment for acral melanomas.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Cutaneous Melanoma in the Context of Aging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

David RussoDepartment of Dermatology, Pontchaillou Hospital, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Stéphane DalleCancer Research Center of Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Olivier DereureDepartment of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Laurent MortierUniversité Lille, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.
Sophie Dalac-RatDermatology Department, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, CHU Le Bocage, Dijon, France.
Caroline DutriauxCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France.
Marie-Thérèse LecciaDermatology Department, CHU Albert Michalon, Grenoble, France.
Delphine LegoupilDermatology Department, CHRU Brest, Brest, France.
Henri MontaudiéDermatology Department, Nice Hospital, Nice, France.
Eve MaubecDermatology Department, Avicenne Hospital, AP-HP, Bobigny, France.
Julie De QuatrebarbesDermatology Department, CH d'Annecy, Pringy, France.
Jean-Philippe ArnaultDermatology Department, CHU Amiens Picardie, Amiens, France.
Florence Granel BrocardDermatology Department, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Philippe SaïagDermatology Department, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin en Yvelines, AP-HP, Boulogne, France.
Brigitte DrenoNantes Université, Univ Angers, INSERM, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302, Nantes, France.
Clara AllayousAP-HP, Dermatology Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Bastien OrianoAP-HP, Dermatology Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Wendy LefevreAP-HP, Dermatology Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Céleste LebbéAP-HP, Dermatology Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Lise BoussemartNantes Université, Univ Angers, INSERM, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302, Nantes, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne · FRHôpital Saint Eloi · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRImmunologie et Nouveaux Concepts en Immunothérapie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The tumor mutational burden (TMB) is high in melanomas owing to UV-induced oncogenesis. While a high TMB is a predictive biomarker of response to PD-1 inhibitors, it may be associated with the rise of resistant clones to targeted therapy over time. We hypothesized that survivals may depend on both the sun-exposure profile of the site of primary melanoma and the type of systemic treatment. Patients and methods: Patients were screened from MelBase, a multicenter biobank dedicated to the prospective follow-up of stage III/IV melanoma. All patients with a known cutaneous primary melanoma who received a 1st-line systemic treatment by immunotherapy or targeted therapy were included (2013-2019). Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 973 patients received either anti PD-1(n=466), anti CTLA-4(n=143), a combination of both (n=118), or targeted therapies (n=246). Patients' characteristics at treatment initiation were: male (62%), median age of 62, AJCC stage IV (84%). Median follow-up was 15.5 months. The primary melanoma was located on chronically sun-exposed skin in 202 patients (G1: head neck), on intermittently sun-exposed skin in 699 patients (G2: trunk, arms, legs), and on sun-protected areas in 72 patients (G3: palms, soles). Median PFS was significantly higher in G1 under anti PD-1 treatment (8.7 months vs 3.3 and 3.4 months for G2 and G3, respectively) (p=0.011). PFS did not significantly differ in other groups. Similarly, median OS was significantly higher in G1 receiving 1 Conclusion: Our study confirms that immunotherapy with anti PD-1 is particularly recommended for melanomas originating from chronically sun-exposed areas, but this finding needs to be confirmed by further research.

Indexed as

acral melanomaimmunotherapymelanomasun-exposureUV signature

Identifiers

PMID37936607
PMCPMC10627180
OpenAlexW4387869313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.