ArticleStem cells translational medicine2024
Sfrp1 as a Pivotal Paracrine Factor in the Trained Pericardial Stem Cells that Foster Reparative Activity.
Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in biomarkers for cardiac fibrosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the potential role of Postn(+) fibroblasts in promoting the progression of myocardial fibrosis after myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An immunostaining-based approach for assessing myocardial viability in the infarcted mouse hearts.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The mechanism of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 in alleviating cardiomyocyte injury and heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- A refined TTC assay precisely detects cardiac injury and cellular viability in the infarcted mouse heart.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cardiac commitment driven by MyoD expression in pericardial stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue damage often induces local inflammation that in turn dictates a series of subsequential responses, such as stem cell activation and growth, to maintain tissue homeostasis. The aim of the study is to testify the possibility of using inflammation-trained stem cells as optimal donor cells to augment the efficacy of cell therapy. The pericardial stem/stromal cells derived from the animals after myocardial infarction (MI-pSC) showed an enhanced myogenic potential and augmented reparative activity after transplantation in the injured hearts, as compared to the Sham-pSC. Bulk RNA-Seq analysis revealed significant upregulation of a panel of myogenic and trophic genes in the MI-pSC and, notably, Sfrp1 as an important anti-apoptotic factor induced robustly in the MI-pSC. Injection of the MI-pSC yielded measurable numbers of surviving cardiomyocytes (Tunel and Casp-3 negative) within the infarct area, but the effects were significantly diminished by siRNA-based silence of Sfrp1 gene in the pSC. Primed Sham-pSC with pericardial fluid from MI rats mimicked the upregulation of Sfrp1 and enhanced myogenic potential and reparative activity of pSC. Taken together, our results illustrated the inflammation-trained pSC favor a reparative activity through upregulation of Sfrp1 gene that confers anti-apoptotic activity in the injured cardiomyocytes. Therefore, the active form of stem cells may be used as a cardiac protective agent to boost therapeutical potential of stem cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.