Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936534›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2024

The Short- and Long-Term Outcome Priorities of a Western Australian Adult Burn Population.

Inge Spronk, Fiona M Wood, Mark W Fear, Corine A Lansdorp, Dale W Edgar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inge SpronkDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000CA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-576X
Fiona M WoodState Adult Burn Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, South Metropolitan Health Service, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-6588
Mark W FearBurn Injury Research Unit, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-4666
Corine A LansdorpDepartment Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1007MB, The Netherlands.
Dale W EdgarState Adult Burn Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, South Metropolitan Health Service, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

Funding

Dutch Burns Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To optimize patient recovery, understanding which outcomes are most important to burn patients is key. However, research to determine what outcomes are patient priorities is limited. Therefore, we assessed what outcomes are most important to Western Australian burn patients, separately in the short-term (<6 months) and long-term (6-24 months) after injury. Adult patients who had a burn injury 3-36 months ago completed a survey, rating the importance of 36 short- and long-term outcomes. The survey items were ranked according to the number of patients reporting the outcome as "very important." Results were compared between subgroups based on age, gender, burn size, and number of surgeries. Ninety-three patients were included. In the short-term, "not having a wound infection" (87.1%), "good wound healing" (83.9%), and "walking or moving around" (74.7%) were the most important outcomes. "Lifting or moving something" (67.6%), "walking or moving around" (66.2%), and "being independent" (66.2%) were reported as most important in the long-term. Scar-related outcomes were more important to females and to patients with multiple surgeries; mental health outcomes were priorities for females and patients with major burns; walking and moving around to males and older patients; and social and financial outcomes were rated highly by patients with major burns and multiple surgeries. In conclusion, the most important outcomes were consistent across time periods, indicating the importance of core outcomes in longitudinal follow-up. The wide range of priority outcomes and differences between subgroups underlines the need for multidisciplinary care and a patient-centered approach to support patients.

Indexed as

BurnsQuality of LifeAdultAustraliaCicatrixFemaleHumansMaleWound Healingburnsoutcomespatient priorities

Identifiers

PMID37936534
PMCPMC10911694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.