ArticleHospital pediatrics2023
Factors Associated With Actionable Gastrointestinal Panel Results in Hospitalized Children.
Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of treatment effectiveness, follow-up results, and recurrence patterns in children withFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Impact of gastrointestinal multiplex PCR on the diagnosis, clinical correlation, and antimicrobial stewardship in pediatric acute gastroenteritis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Opportunities for collaboration: the synergy between antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship in pediatrics.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThere is uncertainty regarding which hospitalized patients with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) benefit from gastrointestinal panel (GIP) testing. Unnecessary testing may lead to increased costs, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment. In general, AGE management and outcomes are most impacted if an actionable (bacterial or parasitic) result is obtained. We aimed to assess which clinical reasons for ordering GIP testing ("order indications") and patient factors were associated with actionable results.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study of pediatric patients hospitalized between 2015 and 2018 at a large pediatric health care system with diarrhea and a GIP performed. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine associations between actionable GIP results and order indication, stool frequency, and demographics. Findings were evaluated in patients with complex chronic conditions (CCC) and non-CCC patients.
resultsThere were 1124 GIPs performed in 967 encounters. Non-CCC patients had more actionable results than CCC patients, and reasons for testing differed. Across both cohorts, age ≥1 year old was positively associated with actionable results. For non-CCC patients, actionable results were associated with "diarrhea with blood or pus" order indication and nonwinter season; international travel was associated with non-Clostridioides difficile bacteria and parasites. No order indications were associated with actionable results for CCC patients.
conclusionsPatient factors and order indications that may help identify children hospitalized for AGE with actionable GIP results include older age (regardless of CCC status), as well as bloody stools and international travel in previously healthy children. Prospective validation of these findings could help improve diagnostic stewardship and decrease unnecessary testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.