Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936197›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2023

VBCG: 20 validated bacterial core genes for phylogenomic analysis with high fidelity and resolution.

Renmao Tian, Behzad Imanian

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distribution of Antibiotic Resistance Genes inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Host Specificity ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Beyond H37Rv:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renmao TianInstitute for Food Safety and Health, Illinois Institute of Technology, Bedford Park, IL, 60501, USA.
Behzad ImanianInstitute for Food Safety and Health, Illinois Institute of Technology, Bedford Park, IL, 60501, USA. bimanian@iit.edu.
Illinois Institute of Technology · US

Funding

National Center for Food Safety and TechnologyU19FD005322 · FDA · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Brian Todd Schaneberg · 2014 to 2026
$52.7M
FDA HHS U19 FD005322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhylogenomic analysis has become an inseparable part of studies of bacterial diversity and evolution, and many different bacterial core genes have been collated and used for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. However, these genes have been selected based on their presence and single-copy ratio in all bacterial genomes, leaving out the gene's 'phylogenetic fidelity' unexamined.

resultsFrom 30,522 complete genomes covering 11,262 species, we examined 148 bacterial core genes that have been previously used for phylogenomic analysis. In addition to the gene presence and single-copy rations, we evaluated the gene's phylogenetic fidelity by comparing each gene's phylogeny with its corresponding 16S rRNA gene tree. Out of the 148 bacterial genes, 20 validated bacterial core genes (VBCG) were selected as the core gene set with the highest bacterial phylogenetic fidelity. Compared to the larger gene set, the 20-gene core set resulted in more species having all genes present and fewer species with missing data, thereby enhancing the accuracy of phylogenomic analysis. Using Escherichia coli strains as examples of prominent bacterial foodborne pathogens, we demonstrated that the 20 VBCG produced phylogenies with higher fidelity and resolution at species and strain levels while 16S rRNA gene tree alone could not.

conclusionThe 20 validated core gene set improves the fidelity and speed of phylogenomic analysis. Among other uses, this tool improves our ability to explore the evolution, typing and tracking of bacterial strains, such as human pathogens. We have developed a Python pipeline and a desktop graphic app (available on GitHub) for users to perform phylogenomic analysis with high fidelity and resolution. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialGenome, BacterialBacteriaHumansPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial core genesPathogen typingPhylogenetic treePhylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID37936197
PMCPMC10631056
OpenAlexW4388479712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.