Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936155›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2023

Changes in contributions of different Anopheles vector species to malaria transmission in east and southern Africa from 2000 to 2022.

Betwel J Msugupakulya, Naomi H Urio, Mohammed Jumanne, Halfan S Ngowo, Prashanth Selvaraj, Fredros O Okumu, Anne L Wilson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Betwel J MsugupakulyaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, PO Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania. jbetwel@ihi.or.tz.
Naomi H UrioEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, PO Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Mohammed JumanneEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, PO Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Halfan S NgowoEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, PO Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Prashanth SelvarajInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA.
Fredros O OkumuEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, PO Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania. fredros@ihi.or.tz.
Anne L WilsonDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Anne.Wilson@lstmed.ac.uk.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through Pan African Mosquito control Association OPP1214408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria transmission in Africa is facilitated by multiple species of Anopheles mosquitoes. These vectors have different behaviors and vectorial capacities and are affected differently by vector control interventions, such as insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying. This review aimed to assess changes in the contribution of different vector species to malaria transmission in east and southern Africa over 20 years of widespread insecticide-based vector control.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Global Health, and Web of Science online databases for articles published between January 2000 and April 2023 that provided species-specific sporozoite rates for different malaria vectors in east and southern Africa. We extracted data on study characteristics, biting rates, sporozoite infection proportions, and entomological inoculation rates (EIR). Using EIR data, the proportional contribution of each species to malaria transmission was estimated.

resultsStudies conducted between 2000 and 2010 identified the Anopheles gambiae complex as the primary malaria vector, while studies conducted from 2011 to 2021 indicated the dominance of Anopheles funestus. From 2000 to 2010, in 57% of sites, An. gambiae demonstrated higher parasite infection prevalence than other Anopheles species. Anopheles gambiae also accounted for over 50% of EIR in 76% of the study sites. Conversely, from 2011 to 2021, An. funestus dominated with higher infection rates than other Anopheles in 58% of sites and a majority EIR contribution in 63% of sites. This trend coincided with a decline in overall EIR and the proportion of sporozoite-infected An. gambiae. The main vectors in the An. gambiae complex in the region were Anopheles arabiensis and An. gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.), while the important member of the An. funestus group was An. funestus s.s.

conclusionThe contribution of different vector species in malaria transmission has changed over the past 20 years. As the role of An. gambiae has declined, An. funestus now appears to be dominant in most settings in east and southern Africa. Other secondary vector species may play minor roles in specific localities. To improve malaria control in the region, vector control should be optimized to match these entomological trends, considering the different ecologies and behaviors of the dominant vector species.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesMalariaMalaria, FalciparumAfrica, SouthernAnimalsFeeding BehaviorInsect VectorsMosquito VectorsSporozoitesInsecticidesAnophelesEast and southern AfricaEntomological trendsMalaria transmission

Identifiers

PMID37936155
PMCPMC10631025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.