Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936151›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2023

Location and timing govern tripartite interactions of fungal phytopathogens and host in the stem canker species complex.

Elise J Gay, Noémie Jacques, Nicolas Lapalu, Corinne Cruaud, Valerie Laval, Marie-Hélène Balesdent, Thierry Rouxel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elise J GayUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Noémie JacquesUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Nicolas LapaluUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Corinne CruaudGenoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.
Valerie LavalUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Marie-Hélène BalesdentUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Thierry RouxelUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UR BIOGER, 91120, Palaiseau, France. thierry.rouxel@inrae.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9563-1793
Université Paris-Saclay · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeptosphaeria maculans "brassicae" (Lmb) and Leptosphaeria biglobosa "brassicae" (Lbb) make up a species complex involved in the stem canker (blackleg) disease of rapeseed (Brassica napus). They coinfect rapeseed together, from the early stage of infection on leaves to the final necrotic stage at the stem base, and both perform sexual crossings on plant residues. L. biglobosa is suggested to be a potential biocontrol agent against Lmb, but there has been no mechanistic investigation of the different types of interactions that may occur between the plant and the two fungal species.

resultsWe investigated the bi- or tripartite interaction mechanisms by (i) confronting Lmb and Lbb in culture conditions or during cotyledon infection, with different timing and/or spore concentration regimes, (ii) performing RNA-Seq experiments in vitro or on the kinetics of infection of cotyledons infected by Lmb and/or Lbb to evaluate the transcriptomic activity and the plant response when both fungal species are inoculated together. Lbb infection of B. napus cotyledons was typical of a necrotrophic behavior, with a very early setup of one pathogenicity program and very limited colonization of tissues. This contrasted with the complex succession of pathogenicity programs of the hemibiotroph Lmb. During simultaneous co-infection by both species, Lmb was strongly impacted in its growth and transcriptomic dynamics both in vitro and in planta, while Lbb was unaffected by the presence of Lmb. However, the drastic inhibition of Lmb growth by Lbb was ineffective in the case of delayed inoculation with Lbb or a lower amount of spores of Lbb compared to Lmb.

conclusionsOur data suggest that Lmb growth inhibition by Lbb is the result of a combination of factors that may include competition for trophic resources, the generation by Lbb of an environment unsuitable for the lifecycle of Lmb or/and the effect on Lmb of plant defense responses induced by Lbb. It indicates that growth inhibition occurs in very specific conditions (i.e., co-inoculation at the same place of an equal amount of inoculum) that are unlikely to occur in the field where their coexistence does not prevent any species from completing their life cycle.

Indexed as

AscomycotaBrassica napusCotyledonGene Expression ProfilingPlant DiseasesTranscriptomeBrassica napusCompetitionFungal biologyLeptosphaeria biglobosaLeptosphaeria maculansPathogenicity programPlant defense responsesTranscriptomicsTripartite interactions

Identifiers

PMID37936151
PMCPMC10631019
OpenAlexW4388464712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.