Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936150›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Clinical application of 3D printing-assisted patient-specific instrument osteotomy guide in stiff clubfoot: preliminary findings.

Wei Liu, Siping Zhang, Wenhao Zhang, Fei Li, Aihelamu Tueraili, Ling Qi, Chengwei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Clinical application research of three-dimensional printed patient-specific cutting guides in Cole midfoot osteotomy].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Application of patient-specific surgical guides in foot and ankle surgery.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei LiuThe Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Siping ZhangThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Wenhao ZhangThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Fei LiThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Aihelamu TuerailiThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Ling QiThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Chengwei WangThe Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China. xjfootankle@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81860164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe orthopedic treatment of the stiff clubfoot is challenging for clinicians, and the purpose of this study was to explore the preliminary findings of 3D printing-assisted patient-specific instrument (PSI) osteotomy guide for use in the orthopedic treatment of the stiff clubfoot. MATERIAL AND

methodsThere were 20 patients (25 feet) with stiff clubfoot admitted from December 2018 to June 2022, including 13 males (16 feet) and 7 females (9 feet), aged 24-52 years, mean 40.15 years; 8 left feet, 7 right feet, 5 bipedal. All patients underwent triple arthrodesis and were divided into 10 cases (12 feet) in the PSI group (n = 12) and 10 cases (13 feet) in the conventional surgery group (n = 13) according to the surgical approach. The duration of surgery and the number of radiation exposures were recorded in all cases, and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), and International Congenital Clubfoot Study Group (ICFSG) scoring systems were applied postoperatively to assess the effect of corrective treatment. All measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and differences between groups were determined by Student's t test. All count data between the two groups were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test analysis.

resultsAll 20 patients (25 feet) were followed up for 1 year. No major complications related to osteotomy, such as overcorrection, incomplete correction, or bone nonunion, were observed in the PSI and conventional surgery groups at the final follow-up, and the PSI group had the advantage of shorter operative time (P < 0.01), less radiation exposure (P < 0.01), and higher excellent rate compared with the conventional surgery group. The AOFAS score (P > 0.05) and ICFSG score (P > 0.05) at the last follow-up were not statistically significant in both groups, but the excellent rate at the last follow-up was 91.7% in the PSI group which was significantly higher than that of the conventional surgery group at 76.9%.

conclusionsThe utilization of 3D printing-assisted PSI osteotomy guide in orthopedic surgery for stiff clubfoot offers a safe and effective surgical tool for triple joint fusion treatment. This technology simplifies surgical procedures, minimizes intraoperative radiation exposures, reduces surgical time, and enables precise and personalized treatment.

Indexed as

ClubfootOrthopedicsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOsteotomyPrinting, Three-DimensionalTreatment Outcome3D printingNavigationPatient-specific instrumentsStiff clubfootSurgical

Identifiers

PMID37936150
PMCPMC10631177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.