Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936123›Full record

ReviewImplementation science : IS2023

Revisiting the policy ecology framework for implementation of evidence-based practices in mental health settings.

Whitney K Wortham, Aaron H Rodwin, Jonathan Purtle, Michelle R Munson, Ramesh Raghavan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Implementation science : IS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Whitney K WorthamSilver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA. ww1053@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6221-1220
Aaron H RodwinSilver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Jonathan PurtleDepartment of Public Health Policy & Management, Global Center for Implementation Science, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 708 Broadway, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Michelle R MunsonSilver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Ramesh RaghavanSilver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Funding

National Survey of State Policy Decision-making and SimulationP50MH113662 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E., MCKAY, MARY MCKERNAN · 2019 to 2022
$6.9M
Implementation of the Federal 988 Suicide and Mental Health Crisis Hotline Policy: Determinants and Effects of State Policy Implementation Financing StrategiesR01MH131649 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Jonathan Purtle · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Policy Implementation Research on Earmarked Taxes for Mental Health ServicesR21MH125261 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PURTLE, JONATHAN · 2021 to 2022
$404k
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113662NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH131649NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH125261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past three decades, policy actors and actions have been highly influential in supporting the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in mental health settings. An early examination of these actions resulted in the Policy Ecology Framework (PEF), which was originally developed as a tactical primer for state and local mental health regulators in the field of child mental health. However, the policy landscape for implementation has evolved significantly since the original PEF was published. An interrogation of the strategies originally proposed in the PEF is necessary to provide an updated menu of strategies to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of policy action and promote system improvement.

objectivesThis paper builds upon the original PEF to address changes in the policy landscape for the implementation of mental health EBPs between 2009 and 2022. We review the current state of policy strategies that support the implementation of EBPs in mental health care and outline key areas for policy-oriented implementation research. Our review identifies policy strategies at federal, state, agency, and organizational levels, and highlights developments in the social context in which EBPs are implemented. Furthermore, our review is organized around some key changes that occurred across each PEF domain that span organizational, agency, political, and social contexts along with subdomains within each area. DISCUSSION: We present an updated menu of policy strategies to support the implementation of EBPs in mental health settings. This updated menu of strategies considers the broad range of conceptual developments and changes in the policy landscape. These developments have occurred across the organizational, agency, political, and social contexts and are important for policymakers to consider in the context of supporting the implementation of EBPs. The updated PEF expands and enhances the specification of policy levers currently available, and identifies policy targets that are underdeveloped (e.g., de-implementation and sustainment) but are becoming visible opportunities for policy to support system improvement. The updated PEF clarifies current policy efforts within the field of implementation science in health to conceptualize and better operationalize the role of policy in the implementation of EBPs.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeMental HealthChildHumansImplementation SciencePolicySocial EnvironmentAdoptionConsumer involvementDe-implementationEvidence-based practiceMental healthMental health paritySustainment

Identifiers

PMID37936123
PMCPMC10629012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.