Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37936022›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Perceptions of Readiness for Practice After Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship: A Survey Study.

Shay Behrens, Heather A Lillemoe, Sean P Dineen, Maria C Russell, Brendan Visser, Russell S Berman, Jeffrey M Farma, Elizabeth Grubbs, Jeremy L Davis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Enhancing Graduate Surgical Education: Recommendations for Development of Common Surgery Education and Training Accreditation Standards.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shay BehrensSurgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Heather A LillemoeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sean P DineenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Maria C RussellDivision of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Brendan VisserDepartment of General Surgery, Stanford Hospital, Stanford, CA, USA.
Russell S BermanDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey M FarmaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elizabeth GrubbsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jeremy L DavisSurgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. jeremy.davis@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-6936
National Cancer Institute · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USEmory University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNew York University · US

Funding

Surgical Oncology Program Training ProgramZIEBC012097 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BLAKELY, ANDREW · 2022 to 2025
$17.3M
Molecular Mechanisms Driving Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer SyndromeZIDBC012159 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DAVIS, JEREMY · 2024 to 2024
$714k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical subspecialty training aims to meet the needs of practicing surgeons and their communities. This study investigates career preparedness of Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) fellowship graduates, identifies factors associated with practice readiness, and explores potential opportunities to improve the current training model.

methodsThe Society of Surgical Oncology partnered with the National Cancer Institute to conduct a 36-question survey of CGSO fellowship graduates from 2012 to 2022.

resultsThe overall survey response rate was 38% (221/582) with a slight male predominance (63%). Forty-six percent of respondents completed their fellowship after 2019. Factors influencing fellowship program selection include breadth of cancer case exposure (82%), mentor influence (66%), and research opportunities (38%). Overall, graduates reported preparedness for practice; however, some reported unpreparedness in research (18%) and in specific clinical areas: thoracic (43%), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) (15%), and hepato-pancreato-biliary (15%) surgery. Regarding technical preparedness, 70% reported being "very prepared". Respondents indicated lack of preparedness in robotic (63%) and laparoscopic (33%) surgery approaches. Suggestions for training improvement included increased autonomy and case volumes, program development, and research infrastructure. Current practice patterns by graduates demonstrated discrepancies between ideal contracts and actual practice breakdowns, particularly related to the practice of general surgery.

conclusionsThis study of CGSO fellowship graduates demonstrates potential gaps between trainee expectations and the realities of surgical oncology practice. Although CGSO fellowship appears to prepare surgeons for careers in surgical oncology, there may be opportunities to refine the training model to better align with the needs of practicing surgical oncologists.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencySurgical OncologyEducation, Medical, GraduateFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37936022
PMCPMC10695882
OpenAlexW4388449227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.