ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2023
Epidemiology of fragility fracture of the pelvic ring: a regional population-based study in Northern Japan.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Multimodal Machine Learning Predicts 90-Day Treatment Failure in Older Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- [Surgical stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis shows a good age-appropriate result regardless of the surgical procedure].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- One-year mortality rates of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Age-period-cohort analysis of epidemiological trends in pelvic fracture in China from 1992 to 2021 and forecasts for 2046.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using a regional population-based dataset in Japan, we identified the epidemiological characteristics of patients with fragility fractures of the pelvic ring. The incidence rate was 35.5-121.2 per 100,000 population/year. Age-specific incidence increased after 75 years. This fracture is associated with worse prognosis in terms of walking function and life expectancy. PURPOSE: Fragility fracture of the pelvic ring (FFP) is common among older patients; however, little information is available on the epidemiology of FFP worldwide. We aimed to identify the epidemiological characteristics of patients with FFP using a regional population-based dataset in Japan.
methodsThis descriptive epidemiologic study analyzed data obtained from clinical information of patients diagnosed with FFP from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2020 at a regional dominant hospital in Japan. We calculated the crude and age-adjusted annual incidences and the age-specific incidence and described epidemiological date, injury characteristics, walking ability before and after FFP, and mortality. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with walking ability.
resultsWe identified 66 FFP patients, of whom 55 (83.3%) were female, with a mean age of 82.2 years. The crude annual incidence of FFP ranged from 35.5-121.2 per 100,000 population/year during the study period. The age-specific incidence of FFP increased after 75 and 80 years in females and males, respectively. In total, 44.4% of patients had declines in walking ability 1 year after their FFP injuries. Patients with declining walking ability were significantly older (p < 0.01), and age ≥ 80 years was significantly associated with the decline in walking ability (p < 0.01). The 1- and 5-year mortality rates were 15.4% and 39.9%, respectively.
conclusionThe incidence rate of FFP was 35.5-121.2 per 100,000 population/year. Age-specific incidence of FFP increased after 75 years. Our results indicate that FFP is associated with worse prognosis of walking function and life expectancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37936012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.