ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Influence of Polymer Stiffness and Geometric Design on Fluid Mechanics in Tissue-Engineered Pulmonary Valve Scaffolds.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There is still much unknown about the fluid mechanical response to cardiac valve scaffolds, even as their implementation in the clinic is on the horizon. Specifically, while degradable polymer valve scaffolds are currently being tested in the pulmonary valve position, their material and mechanical properties have not been fully elucidated. Optimizing these properties are important determinants not only of acute function, but long-term remodeling prospects. This study aimed to characterize fluid profiles downstream of electrospun valve scaffolds under dynamic pulmonary conditions. Valve scaffold design was changed by either blending poly(carbonate urethane) urea (PCUU) with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) to modulate material stiffness or by changing the geometric design of the valve scaffolds. Specifically, two designs were utilized: one modeled after a clinically used bioprosthetic valve design (termed Mk1 design), and another using a geometrically "optimized" design (termed Mk2) based on anatomical data. Particle image velocimetry results showed that material stiffness only had a mild impact on fluid mechanics, measured by velocity magnitude, vorticity, viscous shear stress, Reynolds shear stress, and turbulent kinetic energy. However, comparing the two geometric designs yielded a much greater impact, with the Mk2 valve groups containing the highest PCUU/PCL ratio demonstrating the overall best performance. This report highlights the easily manipulable design features of polymeric valve scaffolds and demonstrates their relative significance for valve function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.