ArticleScientific reports2023
Structure and stability of different triplets involving artificial nucleobases: clues for the formation of semisynthetic triple helical DNA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Derivatives of dPMTO, dMTMO, and dTPT3 as efficient genetic alphabets for artificial DNA.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Conformational analysis of different tautomers of some antibiotics.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A triple helical DNA can control gene expression, help in homologous recombination, induce mutations to facilitate DNA repair mechanisms, suppress oncogene formations, etc. However, the structure and function of semisynthetic triple helical DNA are not known. To understand this, various triplets formed between eight artificial nucleobases (P, Z, J, V, B, S, X, and K) and four natural DNA bases (G, C, A, and T) are studied herein by employing a reliable density functional theoretic (DFT) method. Initially, the triple helix-forming artificial nucleobases interacted with the duplex DNA containing GC and AT base pairs, and subsequently, triple helix-forming natural bases (G and C) interacted with artificial duplex DNA containing PZ, JV, BS, and XK base pairs. Among the different triplets formed in the first category, the C-JV triplet is found to be the most stable with a binding energy of about - 31 kcal/mol. Similarly, among the second category of triplets, the Z-GC and V-GC triplets are the most stable. Interestingly, Z-GC and V-GC are found to be isoenergetic with a binding energy of about - 30 kcal/mol. The C-JV, and Z-GC or V-GC triplets are about 12-14 kcal/mol more stable than the JV and GC base pairs respectively. Microsolvation of these triplets in 5 explicit water molecules further enhanced their stability by 16-21 kcal/mol. These results along with the consecutive stacking of the C-JV triplet (C-JV/C-JV) data indicate that the synthetic nucleobases can form stable semisynthetic triple helical DNA. However, consideration of a full-length DNA containing one or more semisynthetic bases or base pairs is necessary to understand the formation of semisynthetic DNA in living cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.