ArticleRespiratory care2024
Home Noninvasive Ventilation in Myasthenia Gravis.
Article in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNoninvasive ventilation (NIV) plays an important role in avoiding endotracheal intubation during myasthenic crisis, yet there are few published data concerning long-term home NIV in stable out-patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of NIV in a cohort of subjects with stable MG and to analyze contributing factors that could predict the need of NIV.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study that included subjects diagnosed with MG managed in the respiratory care unit over the previous year. Subjects underwent clinical analysis including demographic, clinical, and functional respiratory data.
resultsOf the 50 subjects included, 35 (70%) were positive for nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antibodies, and 68% had a diagnosis of generalized MG. Bulbar symptoms developed in 16 (32%), and 10 (20%) subjects needed long-term home NIV. The only variable predicting the need for long-term NIV was MG severity measured with Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA), mainly grades IIB (odds ratio 0.14 [95% CI 0.02-0.85],
conclusionsHome NIV was needed in a substantial percentage of medically stable subjects with MG, mainly in those with generalized type and with oropharyngeal and/or respiratory muscle involvement (MGFA grades IIB and IIIB).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.