Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37935488›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Going home positive: a qualitative study of the experiences of care for patients with COVID-19 who are not hospitalized.

Katie N Dainty, M Bianca Seaton, Braden O'Neill, Rohit Mohindra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie N DaintyNorth York General Hospital (Dainty, Seaton, Mohindra); Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Dainty), University of Toronto; Unity Health Toronto (O'Neill); Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Mohindra), Toronto, Ont. katie.dainty@utoronto.ca.
M Bianca SeatonNorth York General Hospital (Dainty, Seaton, Mohindra); Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Dainty), University of Toronto; Unity Health Toronto (O'Neill); Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Mohindra), Toronto, Ont.
Braden O'NeillNorth York General Hospital (Dainty, Seaton, Mohindra); Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Dainty), University of Toronto; Unity Health Toronto (O'Neill); Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Mohindra), Toronto, Ont.
Rohit MohindraNorth York General Hospital (Dainty, Seaton, Mohindra); Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Dainty), University of Toronto; Unity Health Toronto (O'Neill); Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Mohindra), Toronto, Ont.
Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute · CAUnity Health TorontoUniversity of Toronto · CAYork General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost Canadians diagnosed with COVID-19 have had mild symptoms not requiring hospitalization. We sought to understand the patient experience of care while being isolated at home after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

methodsWe conducted a phenomenologically informed qualitative descriptive study using in-depth semistructured interviews to identify common themes of experience for patients sent home from hospital with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis. Between July and December 2020, we conducted interviews with patients who were followed by the North York General Hospital COVID Follow-Up Clinic. Patients with mild to moderate symptoms were interviewed 4 weeks after their COVID-19 diagnosis. We conducted the interviews and performed a thematic analysis of the data concurrently, in keeping with the iterative process of qualitative methodology.

resultsWe conducted interviews with 26 patients. From our analysis, 3 themes were developed regarding participants' overall experience: lack of adequate communication, inconsistency of information from various sources, and the social implications of a COVID-19 diagnosis. The implications of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 infection are substantial, even when symptoms are mild and patients self-isolate as recommended. Participants noted communication challenges and inconsistent information, leading to exacerbated stress.

interpretationParticipants shared their experiences of the stigma of testing positive and the frustration of poor communication structures and inconsistent information. Experiencing care during self-isolation at home is an area of increasing importance, and these findings can inform improved support, ensuring access to equitable and safe COVID-19 care for these patients.

Identifiers

PMID37935488
PMCPMC10635702
OpenAlexW4388454765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.