Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37935026›Full record

ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2023

[Numerical expression of the clinical course of the disease. Data management].

Juan Osvaldo Talavera, Ivonne Roy-García, Sofía Teresa Díaz-Torres, Lino Palacios-Cruz, Alejandro Noguez-Ramos, Marcela Pérez-Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel Martínez, Jessica E Silva-Guzmán, Rodolfo Rivas-Ruiz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Risk assessment for complications and stone free status in percutaneous nephrolithotomy].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juan Osvaldo TalaveraCentro Médico ABC, Subdirección de Enseñanza e Investigación. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-7369
Ivonne Roy-GarcíaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Centro de Adiestramiento en Investigación Clínica. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-1859-3866
Sofía Teresa Díaz-TorresCentro Médico ABC, Subdirección de Enseñanza e Investigación. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-2300-7662
Lino Palacios-CruzInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Dr. Ramón de la Fuente, Subdirección de Investigaciones Clínicas, Departamento de Epidemiología Clínica. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0001-9533-2996
Alejandro Noguez-RamosCentro Médico ABC, Subdirección de Enseñanza e Investigación. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-4784-1793
Marcela Pérez-RodríguezInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Centro de Adiestramiento en Investigación Clínica. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-3417-3201
Miguel Ángel MartínezCentro Médico ABC, Subdirección de Enseñanza e Investigación. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-8354
Jessica E Silva-GuzmánCentro Médico ABC, Subdirección de Enseñanza e Investigación. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-6785
Rodolfo Rivas-RuizInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Centro de Adiestramiento en Investigación Clínica. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5967-7222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data management "behind the scenes" refers to collection, cleaning, imputation, and demarcation; and despite of being indispensable processes, they are usually neglected and thus, generate erroneous information. During the collection are errors: omission of covariates, deviation from the objective, and insufficient quality. The omission of covariates distorts the result attributed to the main manoeuvre. Deviation from the primary objective commonly occurs when the outcome is rare, delayed, or subjective and promotes substitution by non-equivalent surrogate variables. Moreover, insufficient quality occurs due to inadequate instruments, omission of the measurement procedure, or measurements out of context, such as attribution at the wrong time or equivalent. Furthermore, cleaning implies identifying erroneous, extreme, and missing values, which may or may not be imputed, depending on the percentage. The values of the manoeuvre or the outcome are never imputed, nor are patients eliminated due to a lack of values. Finally, the demarcation of each variable seeks to give it a clinical meaning about the outcome, for which a hierarchical sequence of criteria is followed: 1) previous clinical study, 2) expert agreement, 3) clinical judgment of the investigator/investigators, and 4) statistics. Acting without quality controls in data management frequently causes involuntary lies and confuses instead of clarifying.

Indexed as

Data ManagementDisease ProgressionHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical EpidemiologyData CollectionData ManagementStatistics

Identifiers

PMID37935026
PMCPMC10756149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.