Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37934911›Full record

Trial reportRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2023

[Ultrasound-guided caudal block with ropivacaine in infraumbilical surgeries in pediatric patients].

Karla Itzel Gutiérrez-Riveroll, Juan José Dosta-Herrera, Héctor Jorge Mejía-Picazo, Karla Guadalupe Lozada-Rosete, Martha Aránzazu Pérez-Penilla

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEnglish AbstractEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karla Itzel Gutiérrez-RiverollInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Hospital General "Dr. Gaudencio González Garza", Departamento de Anestesia Pediátrica. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0001-6421-4436
Juan José Dosta-HerreraInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Hospital General "Dr. Gaudencio González Garza", Jefatura del Servicio de Anestesia. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-0766-362X
Héctor Jorge Mejía-PicazoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Hospital General "Dr. Gaudencio González Garza", Departamento de Anestesia Pediátrica. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3596-1659
Karla Guadalupe Lozada-RoseteInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Hospital General "Dr. Gaudencio González Garza", Departamento de Anestesia Pediátrica. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-6063
Martha Aránzazu Pérez-PenillaSanatorio Durango, Jefatura de Anestesia. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-0649
Centro Médico Nacional La Raza · MXDurango Institute of Technology · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of local anesthetics as part of multimodal analgesia is an attractive concept in pediatric patients, since the evaluation and management of pain is a challenge in children under 7 years of age. Despite having guidelines and multiple studies on volume calculation, no safe and effective recommendation has been issued. Objective: To demonstrate that ultrasound-guided caudal block with a dose of 0.75 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine has the same analgesic effect as a dose of 1.2 mL/kg. Material and methods: Randomized, prospective, longitudinal, comparative equivalence clinical trial. One hundred patients 0-7 years of age scheduled for elective or emergency infraumbilical surgery were enrolled between April 2021 and January 2022. Children were randomized 1:1 to be assigned to ultrasound-guided caudal block. Results: 100 patients divided into two groups with 0.2% ropivacaine volumes (0.75 mL vs. 1.2 mL). Both groups demonstrated the trans-anesthetic and post-anesthetic sedoanalgesia variables without significant differences for both groups on the FLACC pain scale after surgery and in recovery (p > 0.5), in the pain reassessment on the FLACC scale in the office called chronic pain (p > 0.5) in both groups. No complications were reported in the follow-up consultations and no arrhythmias were reported in both groups during surgery. Conclusions: the results of both groups did not show differences between a volume of 0.75 mL and 1.2 mL, the administration of 0.2% ropivacaine is favored with the use of ultrasound, which allows effective administration of lower doses of local anesthetic with reduced risk of complications. It is necessary to carry out studies in other types of surgery to compare the use of less volume of local anesthetic compared to the Melman formula used in this study.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalUltrasonography, InterventionalChildHumansPainPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRopivacaineAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineanestesia caudalAnesthesia, CaudalChildNiñosRopivacaínaRopivacaineUltrasonicsUltrasonido

Identifiers

PMID37934911
PMCPMC10746332
OpenAlexW4388500429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.