Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37934886›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023

Modulating Complex Sentence Processing in Aphasia Through Attention and Semantic Networks.

Carolyn Baker, Tracy Love

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn BakerSDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Language & Communicative Disorders, San Diego, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1459-5028
Tracy LoveSDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Language & Communicative Disorders, San Diego, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-5112-2057

Funding

Neurocognitive Approaches to Communication DisordersT32DC007361 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tracy Love-Geffen · 2005 to 2026
$3.9M
The temporal characteristics of brain-language relationships: Evidence from impaiR01DC009272 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE-GEFFEN, TRACY, SHAPIRO, LEWIS P. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Perfusion informed lesion mapping in aphasiaR21DC015263 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE-GEFFEN, TRACY · 2015 to 2016
$413k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009272NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015263NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC007361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLexical processing impairments such as delayed and reduced activation of lexical-semantic information have been linked to syntactic processing disruptions and sentence comprehension deficits in individuals with aphasia (IWAs). Lexical-level deficits can also preclude successful lexical encoding during sentence processing and amplify the processing costs of similarity-based interference during syntactic retrieval. We investigate whether two manipulations to engage attention and pre-activate semantic features of a target (to-be-retrieved) noun will (a) boost lexical activation during initial lexical encoding and (b) facilitate syntactic dependency linking through improved resolution of interference in IWAs and neurologically unimpaired age-matched controls (AMCs).

methodEye-tracking-while-listening with a visual world paradigm was used to investigate whether semantic and attentional manipulations modulated initial lexical processing and downstream syntactic retrieval of the direct-object noun in object-relative sentences.

resultsIn the attention and semantic manipulations, the AMC group showed no changes in initial lexical access levels; however, gaze patterns revealed clear facilitations in dependency linking and interference resolution. In the IWA group, the attentional cue increased and maintained activation of N1 with modest facilitations in dependency linking. In the semantic condition, IWA results showed a greater degree of facilitation during dependency linking.

conclusionsThe results suggest that attention and semantic activation are parameters that may be manipulated to strengthen encoding of lexical representations to facilitate retrieval (i.e., dependency linking) and mitigate similarity-based interference. In IWAs, these manipulations may help to reduce lexical processing deficits that can preclude successful encoding.

Indexed as

AphasiaLinguisticsAttentionComprehensionHumansLanguageSemanticsSemantic Web

Identifiers

PMID37934886
PMCPMC11001378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.