Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37934558›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Perspectives of Patients With Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Medical Professionals on Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Pune, India: Qualitative Analysis.

Rashmi Padhye, Shruti D Sahasrabudhe, Mark W Orme, Ilaria Pina, Dipali Dhamdhere, Suryakant Borade, Meenakshi Bhakare, Zahira Ahmed, Andy Barton, Mahavir Modi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rashmi PadhyeClinical Research Department, Symbiosis Medical College for Women, Symbiosis University Hospitals and Research Centre, Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0661-7137
Shruti D SahasrabudheClinical Research Department, Symbiosis Medical College for Women, Symbiosis University Hospitals and Research Centre, Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-0115
Mark W OrmeDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-6574
Ilaria PinaDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6294-5398
Dipali DhamdhereClinical Research Department, Symbiosis Medical College for Women, Symbiosis University Hospitals and Research Centre, Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2324-913X
Suryakant BoradeClinical Research Department, Symbiosis Medical College for Women, Symbiosis University Hospitals and Research Centre, Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3966-4760
Meenakshi BhakareDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Symbiosis Medical College for Women, Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-7738
Zahira AhmedDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9535-3023
Andy BartonDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2245-1446
Mahavir ModiPulmonology Department, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-5867
Dominic MalcolmSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-2911
Sundeep SalviClinical Research Department, Symbiosis Medical College for Women, Symbiosis University Hospitals and Research Centre, Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4657-9663
Sally J SinghDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-0366
Symbiosis International University · INUniversity of Leicester · GBLoughborough University · GBRuby Hall Clinic · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality worldwide and in India. Access to nonpharmacological options, such as pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), are, however, limited. Given the difference between need and availability, exploring PR, specifically remotely delivered PR, in a resource-poor setting, will help inform future work.

objectiveThis study explored the perceptions, experiences, needs, and challenges of patients with CRDs and the potential of and the need for PR from the perspective of patients as well as medical professionals involved in the referral (doctors) and delivery (physiotherapists) of PR.

methodsIn-depth qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted among 20 individuals diagnosed with CRDs and 9 medical professionals. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used as we sought to identify the meanings shared both within and across the 2 participant groups.

resultsThe 20 patients considered lifestyle choices (smoking and drinking), a lack of physical activity, mental stress, and heredity as the triggering factors for their CRDs. All of them equated the disease with breathlessness and a lack of physical strength, consulting multiple doctors about their physical symptoms. The most commonly cited treatment choice was an inhaler. Most of them believed that yoga and exercise are good self-management strategies, and some were performing yoga postures and breathing exercises, as advised by friends or family members or learned from a televised program or YouTube videos. None of them identified with the term "pulmonary rehabilitation," but many were aware of the exercise component and its benefits. Despite being naive to smartphone technology or having difficulty in reading, most of them were enthusiastic about enrolling in an application-based remotely delivered digital PR program. The 9 medical professionals were, however, reluctant to depend on a PR program delivered entirely online. They recommended that patients with CRDs be supported by their family to use technology, with some time spent with a medical professional during the program.

conclusionsPatients with CRDs in India currently manage their disease with nonguided strategies but are eager to improve and would benefit from a guided PR program to feel better. A home-based PR program, with delivery facilitated by digital solutions, would be welcomed by patients and health care professionals involved in their care, as it would reduce the need for travel, specialist equipment, and setup. However, low digital literacy, low resource availability, and a lack of expertise are of concern to health care professionals. For India, including yoga could be a way of making PR "culturally congruent" and more successful. The digital PR intervention should be flexible to individual patient needs and should be complemented with physical sessions and a feedback mechanism for both practitioners as well as patients for better uptake and adherence.

Indexed as

asthmabarriers to PRchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasechronic respiratory diseasesCOPDCRDdigital mode of PRIndiainhalerintegrating yoga with PRknowledge about PRmedical professionalpatients’ sufferingpulmonary rehabilitationself-managementthematic qualitative analysistreatment

Identifiers

PMID37934558
PMCPMC10664007
OpenAlexW4386310507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.