ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023
Deep learning performance for detection and classification of microcalcifications on mammography.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating cognitive biases in AI-assisted mammography interpretation: a simulation reader study of explainable AI across radiologist experience levels.European radiology · 2026Article
- Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast tissue density and its correlation with pathologic response: a retrospective artificial intelligence-enhanced radiological study.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Mammography: A Systematic Review of Methods, Evaluation Practices, and Clinical Readiness.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Challenges and strategies for delivering effective breast cancer care in conflict zones.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- AI-Driven Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Imaging Modalities, Deep Learning, and Explainability.Cancers · 2026Review
- Women's perspectives on integrating artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening services in Abu Dhabi, united Arab Emirates.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based classification of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications in mammography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Personalization in Breast Cancer Screening: From Population Models to Individualized Protocols.Cancers · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Applications in Clinical Cancer Detection: A Review of Implementation Challenges and Solutions.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Based on Digital Mammography to Reduce the Need for Invasive Biopsies of Benign Calcifications Classified in BI-RADS Category 4.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- A preliminary investigation into the potential, pitfalls, and limitations of large language models for mammography interpretation.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- CNN-Based Cross-Modality Fusion for Enhanced Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammography and Ultrasound.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Patients' Perceptions and Attitudes to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Concatenated Modified LeNet Approach for Classifying Pneumonia Images.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using a multimodal radiomics and deep learning model.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Disparities in Breast Cancer Diagnostics: How Radiologists Can Level the Inequalities.Cancers · 2023Review
- Comparing Radiologists' and Artificial Intelligence Performance Detecting Suspicious Microcalcifications on Screening Mammograms: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer screening through mammography is crucial for early detection, yet the demand for mammography services surpasses the capacity of radiologists. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in evaluating microcalcifications on mammography. We developed and tested an AI model for localizing and characterizing microcalcifications.
methodsThree expert radiologists annotated a dataset of mammograms using histology-based ground truth. The dataset was partitioned for training, validation, and testing. Three neural networks (AlexNet, ResNet18, and ResNet34) were trained and evaluated using specific metrics including receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The reported metrics were computed on the test set (10% of the whole dataset).
resultsThe dataset included 1,000 patients aged 21-73 years and 1,986 mammograms (180 density A, 220 density B, 380 density C, and 220 density D), with 389 malignant and 611 benign groups of microcalcifications. AlexNet achieved the best performance with 0.98 sensitivity, 0.89 specificity of, and 0.98 AUC for microcalcifications detection and 0.85 sensitivity, 0.89 specificity, and 0.94 AUC of for microcalcifications classification. For microcalcifications detection, ResNet18 and ResNet34 achieved 0.96 and 0.97 sensitivity, 0.91 and 0.90 specificity and 0.98 and 0.98 AUC, retrospectively. For microcalcifications classification, ResNet18 and ResNet34 exhibited 0.75 and 0.84 sensitivity, 0.85 and 0.84 specificity, and 0.88 and 0.92 AUC, respectively.
conclusionsThe developed AI models accurately detect and characterize microcalcifications on mammography. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: AI-based systems have the potential to assist radiologists in interpreting microcalcifications on mammograms. The study highlights the importance of developing reliable deep learning models possibly applied to breast cancer screening. KEY POINTS: • A novel AI tool was developed and tested to aid radiologists in the interpretation of mammography by accurately detecting and characterizing microcalcifications. • Three neural networks (AlexNet, ResNet18, and ResNet34) were trained, validated, and tested using an annotated dataset of 1,000 patients and 1,986 mammograms. • The AI tool demonstrated high accuracy in detecting/localizing and characterizing microcalcifications on mammography, highlighting the potential of AI-based systems to assist radiologists in the interpretation of mammograms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.