Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37934382›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023

Deep learning performance for detection and classification of microcalcifications on mammography.

Filippo Pesapane, Chiara Trentin, Federica Ferrari, Giulia Signorelli, Priyan Tantrige, Marta Montesano, Crispino Cicala, Roberto Virgoli, Silvia D'Acquisto, Luca Nicosia and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Filippo PesapaneBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. filippo.pesapane@ieo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0374-5054
Chiara TrentinBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Federica FerrariBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giulia SignorelliBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Priyan TantrigeDepartment of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Marta MontesanoBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Crispino CicalaLaife Reply, Milan, Italy.
Roberto VirgoliLaife Reply, Milan, Italy.
Silvia D'AcquistoLaife Reply, Milan, Italy.
Luca NicosiaBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Daniela OriggiMedical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Enrico CassanoBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITReply (Italy) · ITKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer screening through mammography is crucial for early detection, yet the demand for mammography services surpasses the capacity of radiologists. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in evaluating microcalcifications on mammography. We developed and tested an AI model for localizing and characterizing microcalcifications.

methodsThree expert radiologists annotated a dataset of mammograms using histology-based ground truth. The dataset was partitioned for training, validation, and testing. Three neural networks (AlexNet, ResNet18, and ResNet34) were trained and evaluated using specific metrics including receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The reported metrics were computed on the test set (10% of the whole dataset).

resultsThe dataset included 1,000 patients aged 21-73 years and 1,986 mammograms (180 density A, 220 density B, 380 density C, and 220 density D), with 389 malignant and 611 benign groups of microcalcifications. AlexNet achieved the best performance with 0.98 sensitivity, 0.89 specificity of, and 0.98 AUC for microcalcifications detection and 0.85 sensitivity, 0.89 specificity, and 0.94 AUC of for microcalcifications classification. For microcalcifications detection, ResNet18 and ResNet34 achieved 0.96 and 0.97 sensitivity, 0.91 and 0.90 specificity and 0.98 and 0.98 AUC, retrospectively. For microcalcifications classification, ResNet18 and ResNet34 exhibited 0.75 and 0.84 sensitivity, 0.85 and 0.84 specificity, and 0.88 and 0.92 AUC, respectively.

conclusionsThe developed AI models accurately detect and characterize microcalcifications on mammography. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: AI-based systems have the potential to assist radiologists in interpreting microcalcifications on mammograms. The study highlights the importance of developing reliable deep learning models possibly applied to breast cancer screening. KEY POINTS: • A novel AI tool was developed and tested to aid radiologists in the interpretation of mammography by accurately detecting and characterizing microcalcifications. • Three neural networks (AlexNet, ResNet18, and ResNet34) were trained, validated, and tested using an annotated dataset of 1,000 patients and 1,986 mammograms. • The AI tool demonstrated high accuracy in detecting/localizing and characterizing microcalcifications on mammography, highlighting the potential of AI-based systems to assist radiologists in the interpretation of mammograms.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCalcinosisDeep LearningArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMammographyRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMammographyMicrocalcificationsNeural networks (computer)

Identifiers

PMID37934382
PMCPMC10630180
OpenAlexW4388464698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.