Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37934250›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2024

Longitudinal Analysis of Dysphagia and Factors Related to Postoperative Pneumonia in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Asako Kaneoka, Haruhi Inokuchi, Rumi Ueha, Taku Sato, Takao Goto, Akihito Yamauchi, Yasuyuki Seto, Nobuhiko Haga

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The prevalence, nature and severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia in the acute post-operative phase following curative resection for esophageal cancer.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Asako KaneokaThe University of Tokyo Hospital Rehabilitation Center, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. kaneokaa-reh@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8203-3372
Haruhi InokuchiThe University of Tokyo Hospital Rehabilitation Center, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Rumi UehaThe University of Tokyo Hospital Swallowing Center, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Taku SatoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Takao GotoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Akihito YamauchiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yasuyuki SetoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Nobuhiko HagaRehabilitation Services Bureau, The National Rehabilitation Center for Persons With Disabilities, 4-1 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8555, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JPNational Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 187100000546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have quantified longitudinal changes in swallowing in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. This study longitudinally analyzed the changes in the Modified Barium Swallow Study Impairment Profile (MBSImP™) scores, swallowing kinematic measurements, and swallowing-related symptoms in patients undergoing esophagectomy. We also examined the association between identified swallowing impairment and aspiration pneumonia after surgery. We included consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy and completed laryngoscopy and videofluoroscopy before, two weeks, and three months after surgery. We analyzed physiological impairments using the MBSImP. We also assessed the swallowing kinematics on a 5 mL thickened liquid bolus at three time points. Vocal fold mobility was assessed using a laryngoscope. Repeated measures were statistically examined for longitudinal changes in swallowing function. The association between the significant changes identified after esophagectomy and aspiration pneumonia was tested. Twenty-nine patients were included in this study. Preoperative swallowing function was intact in all participants. The timing of swallowing initiation and opening of the pharyngoesophageal segment remained unchanged after surgery. Tongue base retraction and pharyngeal constriction ratio worsened two weeks after surgery but returned to baseline levels three months after surgery. Three months after surgery, hyoid displacement and vocal fold immobility did not fully recover. Aspiration pneumonia occurred in nine patients after surgery and was associated with postoperative MBSImP pharyngeal residue scores. Decreased hyoid displacement and vocal fold immobility were observed postoperatively and persisted for a long time. The postoperative pharyngeal residue was associated with pneumonia and thus should be appropriately managed after surgery.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyPneumonia, AspirationPostoperative ComplicationsAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaDeglutitionFemaleFluoroscopyHumansLaryngoscopyLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsDysphagiaEsophageal cancerKinematic analysisMBSImP™

Identifiers

PMID37934250
PMCPMC11127821
OpenAlexW4388460208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.