SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2024
Factors influencing methotrexate pharmacokinetics highlight the need for individualized dose adjustment: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research on the utilization of population pharmacokinetic model: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Population Pharmacokinetics and Covariate Analysis of Methotrexate in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Molecular mechanisms underlying methotrexate-induced intestinal injury and protective strategies.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for methotrexate (MTX) dosage for all ages, assess the association between concentration and clearance, and determine covariates affecting MTX disposition.
methodsWe compared MTX PK profiles among neonates, children, and adults by performing a systematic literature search for published population MTX models and conducted a Monte Carlo-based meta-analysis. Subsequently, we evaluated study quality and covariates significantly affecting dosage regimens and compared LDMTX and HDMTX PK profiles.
resultsOf the total 40 studies included, 34 were HDMTX, and six were LDMTX studies. For HDMTX, three studies involving neonates reported estimated apparent clearances (median, range) of 0.53 (0.27-0.77) L/kg/h; for 14 studies involving children, 0.23 (0.07-0.23) L/kg/h; and for 13 involving adults, 0.11 (0.03-0.22) L/kg/h. Neonates had a higher volume of distribution than children and adults. For LDMTX studies, apparent clearance was 0.085 (0.05-1.68) L/kg/h, and volume of distribution was 0.25 (0.018-0.47) L/kg, lower than those of HDMTX studies, with large between-subject variability. Bodyweight significantly influenced apparent clearance and volume of distribution, whereas renal function mainly influenced clearance. Mutations in certain genes reduced MTX clearance by 8-35.3%, whereas those in others increased it by 15-48%. Body surface area (BSA) significantly influenced apparent clearance with a median reduction of 51% when BSA increased in pediatric patients.
conclusionsMethotrexate dosage regimens were primarily based on body surface area and renal function. Further studies are needed to evaluate MTX pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both children (especially infants) and adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37934204What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.