Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37934160›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

Evaluating Contrast Sensitivity in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration With the Quick Contrast Sensitivity Function.

Philipp Anders, Ghislaine L Traber, Ursula Hall, Simona A Garobbio, Eric J Chan, Chrysoula Gabrani, Hanna Camenzind, Maximilian Pfau, Michael Herzog, Hendrik P N Scholl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. How the window of visibility varies around polar angle.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Geographic atrophy: Understanding the relationship between structure and function.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philipp AndersInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ghislaine L TraberInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ursula HallInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Simona A GarobbioLaboratory of Psychophyics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eric J ChanInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Chrysoula GabraniInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Hanna CamenzindDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Maximilian PfauInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael HerzogLaboratory of Psychophyics, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hendrik P N SchollInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe, validate, and compare the contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) acquired with the novel quick CSF (qCSF) method from patients with early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (eAMD and iAMD) and healthy controls. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual acuity (VA) baseline data from the prospective Multimodal Functional and Structural Visual System Characterization (MUMOVI) study. The qCSF testing was conducted with the manifold contrast vision meter (Adaptive Sensory Technology, San Diego, CA, USA). CS levels at spatial frequencies from 1 cycle per degree (CPD) to 18 CPD, the area underneath the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF), and contrast acuity (CA) were analyzed. The association of functional metrics with variables of interest was tested with linear models. Results: Ninety-four study eyes from 94 study patients were included in the analysis (13 patients with eAMD, 33 patients with iAMD, and 48 healthy controls). Significant differences between the eAMD and the iAMD model estimates were only found for CS at 1 CPD (t value = -2.9, P value = 0.006) and CS at 1.5 CPD (-2.7, 0.01). A specific association between smoking years and CS at 1 CPD (P = 0.02) and CS at 1.5 CPD (P = 0.03) could be described in patients with AMD. Conclusions: The qCSF testing allows the fast measurement of the whole CSF, enabling the integration into clinical routine. We showed that novel qCSF-derived metrics detect slight functional differences between AMD stages, which testing by Pelli-Robson charts or VA testing would miss. This study, therefore, yields novel qCSF-derived candidate metrics for therapeutic trials in AMD.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityMacular DegenerationCross-Sectional StudiesEyeHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37934160
PMCPMC10631510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.