Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37934072›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2023

Comparison of genomic diversity between single and pooled

Vishnu Raghuram, Jessica J Gunoskey, Katrina S Hofstetter, Natasia F Jacko, Margot J Shumaker, Yi-Juan Hu, Timothy D Read, Michael Z David

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intraspecific diversity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From colonisation to chronicity: adaptation ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic diversity of non-typhoidalMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  11. Co-carriage of diverse vancomycin-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vishnu RaghuramMicrobiology and Molecular Genetics Program, Graduate Division of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Laney Graduate School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jessica J GunoskeyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Katrina S HofstetterDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Natasia F JackoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Margot J ShumakerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Yi-Juan HuDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Timothy D ReadDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michael Z DavidDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

Genomics of S. Aureus Colonization after Initial and Recurrent Skin Infections and the Impact of AntibioticsR01AI139188 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVID, MICHAEL ZDENEK · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
Staphylococcus aureus SPREAD (S. aureus Study of Prevalence Resistance and Environmental Dissemination)R01AI158452 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Zdenek David · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Infectious Diseases Across Scales Training ProgramT32AI138952 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Jacobus de Roode · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
Novel Statistical Methods for Analyzing Complex Microbiome DataR01GM141074 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SU, CHANG · 2021 to 2024
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139188NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI158452NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI138952NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common approach to sampling the bacterial populations within an infected or colonized host is to sequence genomes from a single colony obtained from a culture plate. However, it is recognized that this method does not capture the genetic diversity in the population. Sequencing a mixture of several colonies (pool-seq) is a better approach to detect population heterogeneity, but it is more complex to analyse due to different types of heterogeneity, such as within-clone polymorphisms, multi-strain mixtures, multi-species mixtures and contamination. Here, we compared 8 single-colony isolates (singles) and pool-seq on a set of 2286

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsGene FrequencyGenomicsHumansMethicillin ResistanceStaphylococcus aureusadaptationasymptomatic carriagegenetic diversityStaphylococcus aureuswhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37934072
PMCPMC10711313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.