Trial reportThe European journal of general practice2023
Effectiveness of the spirometry-based motivational intervention to quit smoking: RESET randomised trial.
Trial report in The European journal of general practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02153047 (Multicentric Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Long-term Effectiveness of a Motivational Intervention Against Smoking, Based on the Information Obtained From Spirometry in Primary Care.), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicentric Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Long-term Effectiveness of a Motivational Intervention Against Smoking, Based on the Information Obtained From Spirometry in Primary Care.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatable moments for smoking cessation in asthma and COPD: a nationwide cohort study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Article
- Prevalence, diagnostic accuracy, and healthcare utilization patterns in patients with COPD in primary healthcare: a population-based study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Review
- Self-reported dyspnea and interest in a respiratory muscle training program among callers to the New York State Quitline.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
- Looking back at the EJGP in 2023: What a rich harvest of relevant publications for primary care medicine!The European journal of general practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe effectiveness of providing feedback on spirometry results for smoking cessation remains inconclusive according to the current evidence.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of a motivational intervention based on spirometry results in achieving prolonged smoking abstinence (12 months post-intervention). DESIGN AND
settingA randomised, controlled, observer-blinded, multicentre clinical trial was conducted (from January 2012 to December 2015) in 20 primary healthcare centres in the Tarragona province, Spain.
methodsParticipants, active smokers aged 35-70 without known respiratory disease, were recruited from primary healthcare centres by family doctors and nurses. They were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG = 308) or the control group (CG = 306). Both groups received brief smoking cessation counselling. Additionally, the IG underwent spirometry and received detailed information about the results, including lung age. The primary outcome was prolonged abstinence, defined as lasting at least 12 months and validated through cotinine measurement in urine.
resultsThe prolonged abstinence rate was 7.8% in the IG, compared to 2.6% in the CG (
conclusionA primary care-delivered intervention involving brief counselling and detailed spirometry information proves effective in increasing abstinence rates among active smokers without known respiratory disease. Additionally, smoking cessation is also influenced by the individual's stage of change.
trial registrationClinicatTrials.gov NCT02153047.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.