Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37933556›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2024

Integrating Melt Electrowriting and Fused Deposition Modeling to Fabricate Hybrid Scaffolds Supportive of Accelerated Bone Regeneration.

Kian F Eichholz, Pierluca Pitacco, Ross Burdis, Farhad Chariyev-Prinz, Xavier Barceló, Brooke Tornifoglio, Ryan Paetzold, Orquidea Garcia, Daniel J Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kian F EichholzTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9346-7731
Pierluca PitaccoTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland.
Ross BurdisTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland.
Farhad Chariyev-PrinzTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland.
Xavier BarcelóTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland.
Brooke TornifoglioTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland.
Ryan PaetzoldAdvanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02 CP49, Ireland.
Orquidea GarciaJohnson & Johnson 3D Printing Innovation and Customer Solutions, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Irvine, CA, 92618, USA.
Daniel J KellyTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4091-0992

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 12/RC/2278Science Foundation Ireland 17/SP/4721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging additive manufacturing (AM) strategies can enable the engineering of hierarchal scaffold structures for guiding tissue regeneration. Here, the advantages of two AM approaches, melt electrowriting (MEW) and fused deposition modelling (FDM), are leveraged and integrated to fabricate hybrid scaffolds for large bone defect healing. MEW is used to fabricate a microfibrous core to guide bone healing, while FDM is used to fabricate a stiff outer shell for mechanical support, with constructs being coated with pro-osteogenic calcium phosphate (CaP) nano-needles. Compared to MEW scaffolds alone, hybrid scaffolds prevent soft tissue collapse into the defect region and support increased vascularization and higher levels of new bone formation 12 weeks post-implantation. In an additional group, hybrid scaffolds are also functionalized with BMP2 via binding to the CaP coating, which further accelerates healing and facilitates the complete bridging of defects after 12 weeks. Histological analyses demonstrate that such scaffolds support the formation of well-defined annular bone, with an open medullary cavity, smooth periosteal surface, and no evidence of abnormal ectopic bone formation. These results demonstrate the potential of integrating different AM approaches for the development of regenerative biomaterials, and in particular, demonstrate the enhanced bone healing outcomes possible with hybrid MEW-FDM constructs.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone RegenerationWound HealingBiocompatible Materials3D printingangiogenesisbone repairfused deposition modelingmelt electrowritingscaffold architecture

Identifiers

PMID37933556
PMCPMC11468945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.