Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37933461›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024

Automatic Detection and Classification of Modic Changes in MRI Images Using Deep Learning: Intelligent Assisted Diagnosis System.

Gang Liu, Lei Wang, Sheng-Nan You, Zhi Wang, Shan Zhu, Chao Chen, Xin-Long Ma, Lei Yang, Shuai Zhang, Qiang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. MRI radiomics reveals pain-related biomarkers for modic changes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AI for Lesion Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gang LiuClinical School/College of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7802-5341
Sheng-Nan YouState Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Health Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Zhi WangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Shan ZhuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xin-Long MaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Lei YangState Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Health Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Shuai ZhangState Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Health Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Qiang YangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-9734

Funding

Clinical Application-oriented Medical Innovation Foundation from National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Foundation NO.2021-NCRC-CXJJ-ZH-22National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871782Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Project "Unveiling and Directing" Major Project 21ZXJBSY00130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveModic changes (MCs) are the most prevalent classification system for describing intravertebral MRI signal intensity changes. However, interpreting these intricate MRI images is a complex and time-consuming process. This study investigates the performance of single shot multibox detector (SSD) and ResNet18 network-based automatic detection and classification of MCs. Additionally, it compares the inter-observer agreement and observer-classifier agreement in MCs diagnosis to validate the feasibility of deep learning network-assisted detection of classified MCs.

methodA retrospective analysis of 140 patients with MCs who underwent MRI diagnosis and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in Tianjin Hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 was used as the internal dataset. This group consisted of 55 males and 85 females, aged 25 to 89 years, with a mean age of (59.0 ± 13.7) years. An external test dataset of 28 patients, who met the same criteria and were assessed using different MRI equipment at Tianjin Hospital, was also gathered, including 11 males and 17 females, aged 31 to 84 years, with a mean age of 62.7 ± 10.9 years. After Physician 1 (with 15 years of experience) annotated all MRI images, the internal dataset was imported into the deep learning model for training. The model comprises an SSD network for lesion localization and a ResNet18 network for lesion classification. Performance metrics, including accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, confusion matrix, and inter-observer agreement parameter Kappa value, were used to evaluate the model's performance on the internal and external datasets. Physician 2 (with 1 year of experience) re-labeled the internal and external test datasets to compare the inter-observer agreement and observer-classifier agreement.

resultsIn the internal dataset, when models were utilized for the detection and classification of MCs, the accuracy, recall, precision and F1 score reached 86.25%, 87.77%, 84.92% and 85.60%, respectively. The Kappa value of the inter-observer agreement was 0.768 (95% CI: 0.656, 0.847),while observer-classifier agreement was 0.717 (95% CI: 0.589, 0.809).In the external test dataset, the model's the accuracy, recall, precision and F1 scores for diagnosing MCs reached 75%, 77.08%, 77.80% and 74.97%, respectively. The inter-observer agreement was 0.681 (95% CI: 0.512, 0.677), and observer-classifier agreement was 0.519 (95% CI: 0.290, 0.690).

conclusionThe model demonstrated strong performance in detecting and classifying MCs, achieving high agreement with physicians in MCs diagnosis. These results suggest that deep learning models have the potential to facilitate the application of intelligent assisted diagnosis techniques in the field of spine research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSpineEnd-plate osteochondritisMagnetic resonance imagingModic changesResNet18SSD

Identifiers

PMID37933461
PMCPMC10782244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.