Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37933436›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2024

Effects of a high-protein, increased-fibre, dry diet supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids on quality of life in dogs undergoing chemotherapy.

Cailin R Heinze, Kristine E Burgess, Lisa G Barber, Kenneth M Rassnick, Gerald S Post, Richard Segaloff, Julie Bayle

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, VeterinaryMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cailin R HeinzeCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8524-6346
Kristine E BurgessCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.
Lisa G BarberCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.
Kenneth M RassnickThe Veterinary Medical Center of Central New York and VCA Colonial Veterinary Hospital, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Gerald S PostThe Veterinary Cancer Center, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA.
Richard SegaloffVCA South Shore Animal Hospital, Weymouth, Massachusetts, USA.
Julie BayleRoyal Canin Research Center, Aimargues, France.
Tufts University · USBouygues (France) · FRSouth Shore Hospital · US

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544NIH HHS UL1TR002544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) in dogs with cancer is a key consideration in the assessment of cancer treatment options. Despite interest in dietary strategies to improve management of oncology patients, there have been very few clinical studies showing the impact of diet on adverse effects of chemotherapy in dogs. This study was a randomised, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter clinical trial to investigate a high-protein, increased-fibre diet supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids, for dogs with cancer undergoing standard-of-care chemotherapy. Client-owned dogs with newly diagnosed grade 2 or higher mast cell tumours (or non-resectable/incompletely resected tumours) or multicentric lymphoma were randomised to receive the test diet (n = 24) or control diet (n = 21) for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were QOL assessments, faecal scores, and blood concentrations of C-reactive protein and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Of 12 QOL parameters, 10 significantly improved from baseline to Week 8 in the test group compared with one in the control group. However, differences between the two groups were only statistically significant for 'frequency of signs of illness' (P = .009). There were no significant differences in the incidence of any adverse events, including gastrointestinal adverse events or clinically significant differences in laboratory parameters or faecal scores between the two groups. The absence of an observed negative impact of the test diet, combined with the magnitude of QOL improvements associated with the diet, suggest that a larger trial is warranted.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDog DiseasesFatty Acids, Omega-3NeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDogsQuality of LifeAntineoplastic AgentsFatty Acids, Omega-3cancerdietdietary fibredietary proteinsomega-3 fatty acidsquality of life

Identifiers

PMID37933436
PMCPMC11115191
OpenAlexW4388458262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.