ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023
Enamel remineralization potential of bioactive glass air abrasion studied via elemental and surface morphology analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remineralization and anti-demineralization effect of orthodontic adhesives on enamel surrounding orthodontic brackets: a systematic review of in vitro studies.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Bio-waste-derived hydroxyapatite from fish bone, bovine bone, and bovine teeth for enamel remineralization.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates the remineralization potential of enamel after bioactive glass (BAG) air abrasion, using Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Analysis (SEM-EDS), Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA), and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Material and Methods: Forty extracted human third molars were divided into four groups with ten samples each. Three groups were subjected to a demineralizing solution of 2.2 mM calcium chloride, 2.2 mM monopotassium phosphate, and 0.05 mM acetic acid, adjusted to a pH of 4.4 using 1 M potassium hydroxide at an intraoral temperature of 37°C for 96 hours. Of the three groups, two were subjected to air abrasion with BAG. One of the air abrasion groups was then further remineralized in 1.5 mM calcium chloride, 0.9 mM sodium phosphate, and 0.15 M potassium chloride, adjusted to a pH of 7.0 at 37°C. The teeth were then evaluated via SEM-EDS and EPMA to measure the calcium-to-phosphorous (Ca:P) ratios, and the surface morphology was investigated using AFM. Results: A measurable decrease in the Ca:P ratio was found after demineralization, which subsequently increased after remineralization. A thin layer of demineralized enamel was removed by the BAG air abrasion. AFM image analysis showed the presence of pits on the surface, which decreased in depth after demineralization, and further after BAG abrasion. Remineralized samples, in contrast, showed a slight increase in pit depth. While the observation of remineralization was statistically significant throughout our study, we could not find any evidence for BAG retention on the surface of the enamel. Conclusions: It is demonstrated that BAG, when delivered via air abrasion, indeed contributes to remineralization of the enamel; however, it does not seem to be a direct result of the presence of retained glass beads on the enamel surface. Given the increase of the Ca:P ratio after remineralization, a possible therapeutic benefit was observed, potentially reducing the probability of fractures in weakened enamel.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.