ArticleCureus2023
Technical Report: Machine-Learning Pipeline for Medical Research and Quality-Improvement Initiatives.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Radiologists' Views on the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology (ATRAI-14).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine-learning techniques have been increasing in popularity within medicine during the past decade. However, these computational techniques are not presented in statistical lectures throughout medical school and are perceived to have a high barrier to entry. The objective is to develop a concise pipeline with publicly available data to decrease the learning time towards using machine learning for medical research and quality-improvement initiatives. This report utilized a publicly available machine-learning data package in R (MLDataR) and computational packages (XGBoost) to highlight techniques for machine-learning model development and visualization with SHaply Additive exPlanations (SHAP). A simple six-step process along with example code was constructed to build and visualize machine-learning models. A concrete set of three steps was developed to help with interpretation. Further teaching of these methods could benefit researchers by providing alternative methods for data analysis in medical studies. These could help researchers without computational experience to get a feel for machine learning to better understand the literature and technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.