Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37933242›Full record

ReviewExploration (Beijing, China)2023

Bioinspired gradient scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Yachen Peng, Yaling Zhuang, Yang Liu, Hanxiang Le, Di Li, Mingran Zhang, Kai Liu, Yanbo Zhang, Jianlin Zuo, Jianxun Ding

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Effects of Water-Soluble CMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yachen PengDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-475X
Yaling ZhuangKey Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-7231
Yang LiuKey Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-9366
Hanxiang LeKey Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6949-1165
Di LiKey Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6783-4542
Mingran ZhangKey Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0922-5663
Kai LiuKey Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1623-9556
Yanbo ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0729-3032
Jianlin ZuoDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-0911
Jianxun DingKey Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5232-8863
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNUnion Hospital · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repairing articular osteochondral defects present considerable challenges in self-repair due to the complex tissue structure and low proliferation of chondrocytes. Conventional clinical therapies have not shown significant efficacy, including microfracture, autologous/allograft osteochondral transplantation, and cell-based techniques. Therefore, tissue engineering has been widely explored in repairing osteochondral defects by leveraging the natural regenerative potential of biomaterials to control cell functions. However, osteochondral tissue is a gradient structure with a smooth transition from the cartilage to subchondral bone, involving changes in chondrocyte morphologies and phenotypes, extracellular matrix components, collagen type and orientation, and cytokines. Bioinspired scaffolds have been developed by simulating gradient characteristics in heterogeneous tissues, such as the pores, components, and osteochondrogenesis-inducing factors, to satisfy the anisotropic features of osteochondral matrices. Bioinspired gradient scaffolds repair osteochondral defects by altering the microenvironments of cell growth to induce osteochondrogenesis and promote the formation of osteochondral interfaces compared with homogeneous scaffolds. This review outlines the meaningful strategies for repairing osteochondral defects by tissue engineering based on gradient scaffolds and predicts the pros and cons of prospective translation into clinical practice.

Indexed as

componentgradient scaffoldosteochondral repairosteochondrogenesis‐inducing factorporetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID37933242
PMCPMC10624381
OpenAlexW4384204602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.