Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37933215›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2024

Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester: A Potential Therapeutic Cancer Agent?

Geir Bjørklund, Olha Storchylo, Massimiliano Peana, Tony Hangan, Roman Lysiuk, Larysa Lenchyk, Oleh Koshovyi, Halyna Antonyak, Nataliia Hudz, Salvatore Chirumbolo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Geir BjørklundCouncil for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (CONEM), Mo i Rana, Norway.
Olha StorchyloMedical Chemistry Department, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, Ukraine.
Massimiliano PeanaDepartment of Chemical, Physical, Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Tony HanganFaculty of Medicine, Ovidius University of Constanta, Constanta, Romania.
Roman LysiukDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Botany, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
Larysa LenchykDepartment of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Oleh KoshovyiCONEM Ukraine Pharmacognosy and Natural Product Chemistry Research Group, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Halyna AntonyakDepartment of Ecology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine.
Nataliia HudzDepartment of Drug Technology and Biopharmaceutics, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
Salvatore ChirumboloDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
National University of Pharmacy · UADanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University · UALviv University · UAOdessa National Medical University · UAOvidius University · ROThe Research Council of Norway · NOUniversity of Opole · PLUniversity of Sassari · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropolis and its major phenolic compound, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), have garnered considerable scientific interest due to their anti- inflammatory properties and potential therapeutic applications.

objectivesThis narrative review explores the potential utility of CAPE in cancer treatment.

methodsWe comprehensively reviewed relevant studies from scientific databases (PubMed and Web of Science) from 2000 to 2022. Our search focused on keywords such as cancer, natural drugs, caffeic acid phenethyl ester, CAPE, cancer cell lines, antitumor effects, and propolis.

resultsCAPE exhibits diverse biological benefits, including antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, and potentially anti-carcinogenic properties. Numerous studies have demonstrated its wide-ranging antitumor effects on various cancer cell lines, including growth inhibition, apoptosis induction, tumor invasiveness prevention, malignancy suppression, and anti-angiogenic activity.

conclusionFollowing comprehensive preclinical toxicity assessments, further evaluation of CAPE's efficacy and safety through clinical trials is highly recommended to elucidate its potential health benefits in diverse forms of human cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCaffeic AcidsNeoplasmsPhenylethyl AlcoholAnimalsApoptosisHumansPropolisAntineoplastic Agentscaffeic acid phenethyl esterCaffeic AcidsPhenylethyl AlcoholPropolisantitumor effectscaffeic acid phenethyl esterCancercancer cell linesnatural drugspropolis.

Identifiers

PMID37933215
OpenAlexW4388459593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.