ArticleMedicine2023
Maturity degree assessment of hospital ward system using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model.
Article in Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe hospital ward system is the core service unit of a hospital and an important aspect of hospital management. The maturity of the hospital ward system represents the level of development and improvement in ward management and services. In order to improve the quality of hospital services, it is significant to assess the maturity of the ward system. Although various assessment methods have been proposed in existing studies, there are some issues such as a single-dimensional factor system, subjectivity in qualitative factor values, and insufficient objectivity in the evaluation methods.
methodsTherefore, based on the data collection of the factors used in the existing literature, this study made correlation analysis, determined the similarity of factors, and established a maturity assessment factor system satisfying distinctiveness and comprehensiveness. Furthermore, an evaluation method for the weights of each factor was proposed based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, while taking account of the ambiguity of expert information. In addition, through the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution method, an objective evaluation method for the maturity of the hospital ward system was established. Finally, a case study involving 6 hospitals in a specific location was conducted.
resultsThere are a total of 16 factors used to assess the maturity of the hospital ward system, among which the most important is Doctor service. The maturity degree of the 6 researched hospitals are 0.4517, 0.0035, 0.4254, 0.8681, 0.6636, 0.1586, and the maturity degree of the 6 researched hospitals are II, I, II, IV, III, I.
conclusionThe factor system constructed in this study effectively reflected the importance of human-related factors in the development process of ward system. The evaluation results were consistent with the actual situation, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.