Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932954›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2024

Leveraging automated approaches to categorize birth defects from abstracted birth hospitalization data.

Suzanne M Newton, Samantha Distler, Kate R Woodworth, Daniel Chang, Nicole M Roth, Amy Board, Hailee Hutcherson, Janet D Cragan, Suzanne M Gilboa, Van T Tong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne M NewtonDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1156-3066
Samantha DistlerDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kate R WoodworthDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Daniel ChangEagle Global Scientific, LLC, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Nicole M RothDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-5561
Amy BoardDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Hailee HutchersonG2S Corporation, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0542-6700
Janet D CraganDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Suzanne M GilboaDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Van T TongDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USEagle Mount · USIncell Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

University of Iowa Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUM1TR004403 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Marlan R Hansen, Patricia Winokur · 2023 to 2026
$16.1M
CDC HHS 200-2019-06754Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Surveillance for Emerging Threats to Pregnant People and Infants Network (SET-NET) collects data abstracted from medical records and birth defects registries on pregnant people and their infants to understand outcomes associated with prenatal exposures. We developed an automated process to categorize possible birth defects for prenatal COVID-19, hepatitis C, and syphilis surveillance. By employing keyword searches, fuzzy matching, natural language processing (NLP), and machine learning (ML), we aimed to decrease the number of cases needing manual clinician review.

methodsSET-NET captures International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes and free text describing birth defects. For unstructured data, we used keyword searches, and then conducted fuzzy matching with a cut-off match score of ≥90%. Finally, we employed NLP and ML by testing three predictive models to categorize birth defect data.

resultsAs of June 2023, 8326 observations containing data on possible birth defects were submitted to SET-NET. The majority (n = 6758 [81%]) were matched to an ICD-10-CM code and 1568 (19%) were unable to be matched. Through keyword searches and fuzzy matching, we categorized 1387/1568 possible birth defects. Of the remaining 181 unmatched observations, we correctly categorized 144 (80%) using a predictive model.

conclusionsUsing automated approaches allowed for categorization of 99.6% of reported possible birth defects, which helps detect possible patterns requiring further investigation. Without employing these analytic approaches, manual review would have been needed for 1568 observations. These methods can be employed to quickly and accurately sift through data to inform public health responses.

Indexed as

Medical RecordsNatural Language ProcessingFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantMachine LearningPregnancyRegistriesautomationbirth defectsmachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID37932954
PMCPMC10872559
OpenAlexW4388461016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.