Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932868›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and prognostic research2023

Development and internal validation of a model predicting patient-reported shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Swiss setting.

Thomas Stojanov, Soheila Aghlmandi, Andreas Marc Müller, Markus Scheibel, Matthias Flury, Laurent Audigé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas StojanovDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Thomas.stojanov@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8172-5326
Soheila AghlmandiDepartment of Clinical Research, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas Marc MüllerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Markus ScheibelResearch and Development, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias FluryCenter for Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, In-Motion, Wallisellen, Switzerland.
Laurent AudigéDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Basel · CHSchulthess-Klinik · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 184959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction models for outcomes after orthopedic surgery provide patients with evidence-based postoperative outcome expectations. Our objectives were (1) to identify prognostic factors associated with the postoperative shoulder function outcome (the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)) and (2) to develop and validate a prediction model for postoperative OSS.

methodsPatients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) were prospectively documented at a Swiss orthopedic tertiary care center. The first primary ARCR in adult patients with a partial or complete rotator cuff tear were included between October 2013 and June 2021. Thirty-two potential prognostic factors were used for prediction model development. Two sets of factors identified using the knowledge from three experienced surgeons (Set 1) and Bayesian projection predictive variable selection (Set 2) were compared in terms of model performance using R squared and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) across 45 multiple imputed data sets using chained equations and complete case data.

resultsMultiple imputation using data from 1510 patients was performed. Set 2 retained the following factors: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, baseline level of depression and anxiety, baseline OSS, operation duration, tear severity, and biceps status and treatment. Apparent model performance was R-squared = 0.174 and RMSE = 7.514, dropping to R-squared = 0.156, and RMSE = 7.603 after correction for optimism.

conclusionA prediction model for patients undergoing ARCR was developed using solely baseline and operative data in order to provide patients and surgeons with individualized expectations for postoperative shoulder function outcomes. Yet, model performance should be improved before being used in clinical routine.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyPrognostic factorsRisk factorsRotator cuff tear

Identifiers

PMID37932868
PMCPMC10629040
OpenAlexW4388442100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.