ReviewJournal of intensive care2023
Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Patients 2023 (J-ReCIP 2023).
Review in Journal of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Korean clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation in critically ill patients and post-intensive care syndrome.Acute and critical care · 2026Guideline
- Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for early rehabilitation in critically ill patients: a systematic review of applied protocols.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel.Intensive care medicine · 2024Guideline
- Article
- Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Patients and Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of day 10 mobilization status for ambulation at hospital discharge in critically ill patients: a historical cohort study in Japan.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- A nationwide 1-day point-prevalence study on rehabilitation practices for intensive care unit patients in South Korea.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation Practices of Adult Patients Admitted to the ICU in Japan: A 1-Day Multicenter Point-Prevalence Study.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Impact of Delayed Initiation of Cardiovascular Physical Therapy on Prolonged Hospital Length of Stay in Patients With Heart Failure.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Dose-response relationship of early out-of-bed mobilization with functional decline and adverse events in patients after cardiovascular surgery requiring prolonged intensive care: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Standard of care for rehabilitation in critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Study Protocol: Protocol of Intensive Care Unit Graded Mobilization (PG-Motion) Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Health science reports · 2026Article
- PICS-SES postintensive care syndrome and socioeconomic status.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Translation and cross-cultural adaption of the German version of the Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale (IMS).Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- Implementation and Challenges of Early-Phase Physiotherapy During Cardiovascular Intensive Care.Circulation reports · 2026Review
- Safety of Early Mobilisation in Critically Ill Patients Under Unusual High-Risk Conditions: A Latin American Case Series.Case reports in critical care · 2026Article
- Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Hemodynamics Compared to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.Physical therapy research · 2026Article
- Best Evidence Summary on Early Exercise for Prevention of ICU-Acquired Weakness: An Evidence-Based Synthesis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Timing of ceiling lift-assisted out-of-bed sitting training and outcomes in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Relationship Between Cardiac Rehabilitation and Recovery From Decline in Activities of Daily Living in Patients Hospitalized With Cardiovascular Disease.Circulation reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
74 authors at 20 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing standardized, high-quality rehabilitation for critically ill patients is a crucial issue. In 2017, the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (JSICM) promulgated the "Evidence-Based Expert Consensus for Early Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit" to advocate for the early initiation of rehabilitations in Japanese intensive care settings. Building upon this seminal work, JSICM has recently conducted a rigorous systematic review utilizing the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This endeavor resulted in the formulation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs), designed to elucidate best practices in early ICU rehabilitation. The primary objective of this guideline is to augment clinical understanding and thereby facilitate evidence-based decision-making, ultimately contributing to the enhancement of patient outcomes in critical care settings. No previous CPGs in the world has focused specifically on rehabilitation of critically ill patients, using the GRADE approach. Multidisciplinary collaboration is extremely important in rehabilitation. Thus, the CPGs were developed by 73 members of a Guideline Development Group consisting of a working group, a systematic review group, and an academic guideline promotion group, with the Committee for the Clinical Practice Guidelines of Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation in Intensive Care of the JSICM at its core. Many members contributed to the development of the guideline, including physicians and healthcare professionals with multiple and diverse specialties, as well as a person who had been patients in ICU. Based on discussions among the group members, eight important clinical areas of focus for this CPG were identified. Fourteen important clinical questions (CQs) were then developed for each area. The public was invited to comment twice, and the answers to the CQs were presented in the form of 10 GRADE recommendations and commentary on the four background questions. In addition, information for each CQ has been created as a visual clinical flow to ensure that the positioning of each CQ can be easily understood. We hope that the CPGs will be a useful tool in the rehabilitation of critically ill patients for multiple professions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.