Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932733›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Extracting laboratory test information from paper-based reports.

Ming-Wei Ma, Xian-Shu Gao, Ze-Yu Zhang, Shi-Yu Shang, Ling Jin, Pei-Lin Liu, Feng Lv, Wei Ni, Yu-Chen Han, Hui Zong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ming-Wei MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No.7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xian-Shu GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No.7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, China. doctorgaoxs@126.com.
Ze-Yu ZhangPhilips Research China, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Shi-Yu ShangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No.7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
Ling JinPhilips Research China, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Pei-Lin LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No.7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
Feng LvDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No.7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
Wei NiPhilips Research China, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Yu-Chen HanPhilips Research China, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Hui ZongPhilips Research China, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Philips (China) · CNPeking University First Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the healthcare domain today, despite the substantial adoption of electronic health information systems, a significant proportion of medical reports still exist in paper-based formats. As a result, there is a significant demand for the digitization of information from these paper-based reports. However, the digitization of paper-based laboratory reports into a structured data format can be challenging due to their non-standard layouts, which includes various data types such as text, numeric values, reference ranges, and units. Therefore, it is crucial to develop a highly scalable and lightweight technique that can effectively identify and extract information from laboratory test reports and convert them into a structured data format for downstream tasks.

methodsWe developed an end-to-end Natural Language Processing (NLP)-based pipeline for extracting information from paper-based laboratory test reports. Our pipeline consists of two main modules: an optical character recognition (OCR) module and an information extraction (IE) module. The OCR module is applied to locate and identify text from scanned laboratory test reports using state-of-the-art OCR algorithms. The IE module is then used to extract meaningful information from the OCR results to form digitalized tables of the test reports. The IE module consists of five sub-modules, which are time detection, headline position, line normalization, Named Entity Recognition (NER) with a Conditional Random Fields (CRF)-based method, and step detection for multi-column. Finally, we evaluated the performance of the proposed pipeline on 153 laboratory test reports collected from Peking University First Hospital (PKU1).

resultsIn the OCR module, we evaluate the accuracy of text detection and recognition results at three different levels and achieved an averaged accuracy of 0.93. In the IE module, we extracted four laboratory test entities, including test item name, test result, test unit, and reference value range. The overall F1 score is 0.86 on the 153 laboratory test reports collected from PKU1. With a single CPU, the average inference time of each report is only 0.78 s.

conclusionIn this study, we developed a practical lightweight pipeline to digitalize and extract information from paper-based laboratory test reports in diverse types and with different layouts that can be adopted in real clinical environments with the lowest possible computing resources requirements. The high evaluation performance on the real-world hospital dataset validated the feasibility of the proposed pipeline.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNatural Language ProcessingElectronic Health RecordsHospitals, UniversityHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalConditional random fieldsInformation extractionLaboratory testOptical character recognitionPaper based medical reports

Identifiers

PMID37932733
PMCPMC10629084
OpenAlexW4388422777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.