ArticleBMC oral health2023
Machine learning in the detection of dental cyst, tumor, and abscess lesions.
Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application and performance of artificial intelligence-based models in the detection, segmentation and classification of periapical lesions: a systematic review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Deep Learning-Assisted Localization of Cystic Lesions and Benign Tumors in the Maxillofacial Region Using Panoramic Radiographs: A Preliminary Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Odontogenous Cysts and Ameloblastomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Keras Slim ResNet-Based Prediction of Furcation Management Recommendations Among Dentists.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparing Neural Networks and Naive Bayes in the Prediction of Drug Gene Interactions of Type 4 Collagenase for Gingival Epithelialization.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Early Prediction of Oral Precancerous Lesions Using Artificial Intelligence.Frontiers in dentistry · 2026Article
- Assessing the Utility of Large Language Models in Guiding Dental Practitioners on Pediatric Patient Care: A Comparative AI Study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning in dentistry: insights, prospects and challenges.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Review
- Predicting the hub interactome of COVID-19 and oral squamous cell carcinoma: uncovering ALDH-mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation via salivary inflammatory proteins.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of light gradient boosting and logistic regression for interactomic hub genes inFrontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Light gradient boosting-based prediction of quality of life among oral cancer-treated patients.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence: A Reliable Tool to Detect the Elongation of the Styloid Process.Cureus · 2023Article
- Curcumin-infused carboxymethyl cellulose-gelatin gel for oral tissue repair: Preliminary evaluation.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveDental panoramic radiographs are utilized in computer-aided image analysis, which detects abnormal tissue masses by analyzing the produced image capacity to recognize patterns of intensity fluctuations. This is done to reduce the need for invasive biopsies for arriving to a diagnosis. The aim of the current study was to examine and compare the accuracy of several texture analysis techniques, such as Grey Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM), Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), and wavelet analysis in recognizing dental cyst, tumor, and abscess lesions. MATERIALS &
methodsThe current retrospective study retrieved a total of 172 dental panoramic radiographs with lesion including dental cysts, tumors, or abscess. Radiographs that failed to meet technical criteria for diagnostic quality (such as significant overlap of teeth, a diffuse image, or distortion) were excluded from the sample. The methodology adopted in the study comprised of five stages. At first, the radiographs are improved, and the area of interest was segmented manually. A variety of feature extraction techniques, such GLCM, GLRLM, and the wavelet analysis were used to gather information from the area of interest. Later, the lesions were classified as a cyst, tumor, abscess, or using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Eventually, the data was transferred into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) (version 21) was used to conduct the statistical analysis. Initially descriptive statistics were computed. For inferential analysis, statistical significance was determined by a p value < 0.05. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used to find the significant difference between assessed and actual diagnosis.
resultsThe findings demonstrate that 98% accuracy was achieved using GLCM, 91% accuracy using Wavelet analysis & 95% accuracy using GLRLM in distinguishing between dental cyst, tumor, and abscess lesions. The area under curve (AUC) number indicates that GLCM achieves a high degree of accuracy. The results achieved excellent accuracy (98%) using GLCM.
conclusionThe GLCM features can be used for further research. After improving the performance and training, it can support routine histological diagnosis and can assist the clinicians in arriving at accurate and spontaneous treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.