ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
Ab initio protein structure prediction: the necessary presence of external force field as it is delivered by Hsp40 chaperone.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activity of Serpins in Context to Hydrophobic Interaction.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Heat Shock Protein and Disaggregase Influencing the Casein Structuralisation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Chameleon sequences-Structural effects.PloS one · 2025Article
- Domain swapping: a mathematical model for quantitative assessment of structural effects.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- Chameleon Sequences-Structural Effects in Proteins Characterized by Hydrophobicity Disorder.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Article
- Hydrophobicity-Based Force Field In Enzymes.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Model of the external force field for the protein folding process-the role of prefoldin.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aqueous environment directs the protein folding process towards the generation of micelle-type structures, which results in the exposure of hydrophilic residues on the surface (polarity) and the concentration of hydrophobic residues in the center (hydrophobic core). Obtaining a structure without a hydrophobic core requires a different type of external force field than those generated by a water. The examples are membrane proteins, where the distribution of hydrophobicity is opposite to that of water-soluble proteins. Apart from these two extreme examples, the process of protein folding can be directed by chaperones, resulting in a structure devoid of a hydrophobic core.
resultsThe current work presents such example: DnaJ Hsp40 in complex with alkaline phosphatase PhoA-U (PDB ID-6PSI)-the client molecule. The availability of WT form of the folding protein-alkaline phosphatase (PDB ID-1EW8) enables a comparative analysis of the structures: at the stage of interaction with the chaperone and the final, folded structure of this biologically active protein. The fuzzy oil drop model in its modified FOD-M version was used in this analysis, taking into account the influence of an external force field, in this case coming from a chaperone.
conclusionsThe FOD-M model identifies the external force field introduced by chaperon influencing the folding proces. The identified specific external force field can be applied in Ab Initio protein structure prediction as the environmental conditioning the folding proces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.