Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932666›Full record

SynthesisBMC primary care2023

Understanding barriers to and facilitators of clinician-patient conversations about brain health and cognitive concerns in primary care: a systematic review and practical considerations for the clinician.

Soo Borson, Gary W Small, Quentin O'Brien, Andrea Morrello, Malaz Boustani

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Shifting Treatment Landscape for Alzheimer's Disease in Primary Care.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparing Short Cognitive Screening Instruments in an Outreach Memory Clinic in Primary Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  19. Primary care preparedness to care for patients with ADRD: A national survey study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Soo BorsonDepartment of Family Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 31 E. MacArthur Crescent B414, Santa Ana, Los Angeles, CA, USA. borson@usc.edu.
Gary W SmallDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Quentin O'BrienScientific and Medical Services, Health & Wellness Partners, LLC, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
Andrea MorrelloScientific and Medical Services, Health & Wellness Partners, LLC, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
Malaz BoustaniDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
George Washington University · USHackensack Meridian Health · USHealthPartners · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care clinicians (PCCs) are typically the first practitioners to detect cognitive impairment in their patients, including those with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias (ADRD). However, conversations around cognitive changes can be challenging for patients, family members, and clinicians to initiate, with all groups reporting barriers to open dialogue. With the expanding array of evidence-based interventions for ADRD, from multidomain care management to novel biotherapeutics for early-stage AD, incorporating conversations about brain health into routine healthcare should become a standard of care. We conducted a systematic review to identify barriers to and facilitators of brain health conversations in primary care settings.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for qualitative or quantitative studies conducted in the US between January 2000 and October 2022 that evaluated perceptions of cognition and provider-patient brain health conversations prior to formal screening for, or diagnosis of, mild cognitive impairment or ADRD. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

resultsIn total, 5547 unique abstracts were screened and 22 articles describing 19 studies were included. The studies explored perceptions of cognition among laypersons or clinicians, or provider-patient interactions in the context of a patient's cognitive concerns. We identified 4 main themes: (1) PCCs are hesitant to discuss brain health and cognitive concerns; (2) patients are hesitant to raise cognitive concerns; (3) evidence to guide clinicians in developing treatment plans that address cognitive decline is often poorly communicated; and (4) social and cultural context influence perceptions of brain health and cognition, and therefore affect clinical engagement.

conclusionsEarly conversations about brain health between PCCs and their patients are rare, and effective tools, processes, and strategies are needed to make these vital conversations routine.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBrainCognitionHumansPrimary Health CareBrain healthCognitive declineDementiaPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID37932666
PMCPMC10626639
OpenAlexW4388415021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.