Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932639›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024

An optimal method of hydrogel spacer insertion for stereotactic body radiation therapy of prostate cancer.

Hiroaki Kobayashi, Takahisa Eriguchi, Tomoki Tanaka, Takeru Ogata, Noriko Osaki, Hideaki Suzuki, Michio Kosugi, Atsuhiro Kumabe, Kozo Sato, Masaru Ishida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroaki KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan. shadow87jp@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-8793
Takahisa EriguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Tomoki TanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Takeru OgataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Noriko OsakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Hideaki SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Michio KosugiDepartment of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.
Atsuhiro KumabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Kozo SatoDepartment of Radiology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Masaru IshidaDepartment of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.
National Defense Medical College Hospital · JPSaitama Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to explore an ideal method for hydrogel spacer insertion by analyzing the efficacy and safety of our originally developed apex expansion method. MATERIALS AND

methodsOverall, 100 patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy were included. A hydrogel spacer was inserted in 64 and 36 patients using the conventional and apex expansion methods, respectively. For dosimetry, we trisected the rectum into the upper rectum, middle rectum, and lower rectum on the sagittal section of magnetic resonance imaging. We compared the dose to each part of the rectum between the two methods using dose-volume histograms. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity assessments were conducted until 3 months of follow-up.

resultsThe whole rectal dose in the apex expansion method group was lower than that in the conventional method group, which was significant in all dose regions (V5-V35). Similarly, in the apex expansion method group, the dose to the middle rectum was lower in the low- to high-dose region (V10-V35), and the dose to the lower rectum was lower in the middle- to high-dose region (V15-35). No Grade ≥ 3 toxicity or procedure-related complications were observed. Additionally, Grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities during the treatment showed no significant differences between the two methods.

conclusionThe apex expansion method may be safe and effective in achieving a more efficient rectal dose reduction by expanding the anterior perirectal space in the prostatic apex area.

Indexed as

HydrogelsProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleOrgans at RiskProstateRadiotherapy DosageRectumHydrogelsHydrogel spacerLower urinary tract symptomsProstate cancerStereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID37932639
OpenAlexW4388440734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.