Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932628›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2024

The Influence of Routine Health care on Reoffending in a Sample of Gun Involved Youths.

Natalie Kroovand Hipple, Theodore S Lentz, Stuart D Lewis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie Kroovand HippleDepartment of Criminal Justice, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. nkroovan@indiana.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3924-7580
Theodore S LentzDepartment of Criminal Justice & Criminology, Helen Bader School of Social Welfare, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3290-1156
Stuart D LewisDivision of Geriatrics and Primary Care, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5418-9388

Funding

Joyce Foundation SG-19-40160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the wake of heightened concerns about gun violence and its impacts on youth, "what works" in gun violence prevention remains a critical public health concern. Gun violence prevention in the U.S. is increasingly interdisciplinary, involving both the criminal legal system and the health care system in developing an evidence base for promising programs and policies. The current study contributes to the literature by examining recidivism outcomes (i.e., rearrest) for a cohort of n = 409 Indianapolis youth involved in gun violence who were court-ordered to complete a health education-based prevention program called Project Life. The youth in our sample were predominantly from marginalized communities, all had been charged with a gun-involved or violence offense, 96% were detained by the juvenile justice system for some time, and 64% received at least one routine well check within five years prior to Project Life. Survival analyses of merged juvenile court records and health records show that routine health care (i.e., well visits) and completing the Project Life program were protective against recidivism, whereas time spent in detention increased risk. The findings provide evidence for the value of interdisciplinary approaches that include the health system in disrupting cycles of gun violence, while reducing the carceral footprint on youth.

Indexed as

FirearmsViolenceAdolescentDelivery of Health CareHealth PromotionHumansPolicySurvival AnalysisGun violenceIndianapolisJuvenile justiceRoutine health careUSAWell visitYouth violence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.