Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37932589›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024

Mesoglycan for the secondary prevention of superficial vein thrombosis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study (METRO Study)-rationale and protocol.

G Camporese, E Bernardi, C Bortoluzzi, F Noventa, P Simioni, METRO Investigator Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03428711 (Mesoglycan), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03428711 phase2completednot on this map

Mesoglycan (Prisma®) Versus Placebo in Secondary Prevention of the Superficial Venous Thrombosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorQuovadis AssociazioneRan2018 to 2024Enrolled560ConditionsSuperficial Venous Thrombosis of Leg, Secondary PreventionArmsMesoglycan Oral Tablet, Placebo Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Superficial Venous Thrombosis: A Comprehensive Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G CamporeseDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. giuseppe.camporese@aopd.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0881-5429
E BernardiEmergency Room, Department of Emergency and Accident Medicine, San Camillo Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
C BortoluzziDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Santa Maria delle Grazie Venice Civil Hospital, Venice, Italy.
F NoventaQUOVADIS Association and Department of Molecular Medicine, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
P SimioniDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
METRO Investigator Study Group
University of Padua · ITOspedale Civile di Venezia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No data is available about pharmacological secondary prevention of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) despite 10-15% of patients develop venous thromboembolic complications at 3-6 months after an adequate treatment of the acute phase. To verify efficacy and safety of mesoglycan in secondary prevention of SVT recurrence and venous thromboembolic complications. Phase III multicenter, double-blind, randomized, superiority trial comparing mesoglycan 50 mg bid vs placebo in consecutive patients with a SVT extended at least 5 cm, after the initial 45-day treatment course with fondaparinux 2.5 mg once-daily. Primary efficacy outcome: SVT recurrence/extension, symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis, death. Primary safety outcome: major bleeding. We hypothesized a 12-month 15% incidence of the primary efficacy outcome in placebo group and a 50% risk reduction in mesoglycan group. A bilateral log-rank test with a sample of 650 patients (randomization 1:1) reach a 90% power, with an α-error of 0.025, of detecting a 7.0% difference (HR = 0.51) after 12 months of treatment, considering a 10% patients drop-out. At deadline (December 31, 2022) 570 patients have been randomized (10% drop rate). Mean age was 63.9 years, 58.8% were women. SVT involved great saphenous vein in 69.3%, small saphenous vein in 13.1%, and collaterals in 17.6% of patients. SVT was the first event in 61.7%, a recurrence in 38.3%, provoked in 50.2% and unprovoked in 49.8%. Patients not experiencing a primary outcome, or not retiring their consent will be followed up to December 31, 2024 when the final data analysis will be performedClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03428711.

Indexed as

GlycosaminoglycansVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisAnticoagulantsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary PreventionTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsGlycosaminoglycansmesoglycanGlycosaminoglycansSecondary preventionSuperficial vein thrombosisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID37932589
PMCPMC10869363
OpenAlexW4388407480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.