ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024
Mesoglycan for the secondary prevention of superficial vein thrombosis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study (METRO Study)-rationale and protocol.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03428711 (Mesoglycan), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mesoglycan (Prisma®) Versus Placebo in Secondary Prevention of the Superficial Venous Thrombosis
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mesoglycan for long-term secondary prevention in patients with superficial vein thrombosis (METRO): a multicentre randomised clinical trial in Italy.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Preclinical Evidence That Mesoglycan Unfolds Complex Anti-Aging Effects in Photoaged Female Facial Skin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Superficial Venous Thrombosis: A Comprehensive Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No data is available about pharmacological secondary prevention of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) despite 10-15% of patients develop venous thromboembolic complications at 3-6 months after an adequate treatment of the acute phase. To verify efficacy and safety of mesoglycan in secondary prevention of SVT recurrence and venous thromboembolic complications. Phase III multicenter, double-blind, randomized, superiority trial comparing mesoglycan 50 mg bid vs placebo in consecutive patients with a SVT extended at least 5 cm, after the initial 45-day treatment course with fondaparinux 2.5 mg once-daily. Primary efficacy outcome: SVT recurrence/extension, symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis, death. Primary safety outcome: major bleeding. We hypothesized a 12-month 15% incidence of the primary efficacy outcome in placebo group and a 50% risk reduction in mesoglycan group. A bilateral log-rank test with a sample of 650 patients (randomization 1:1) reach a 90% power, with an α-error of 0.025, of detecting a 7.0% difference (HR = 0.51) after 12 months of treatment, considering a 10% patients drop-out. At deadline (December 31, 2022) 570 patients have been randomized (10% drop rate). Mean age was 63.9 years, 58.8% were women. SVT involved great saphenous vein in 69.3%, small saphenous vein in 13.1%, and collaterals in 17.6% of patients. SVT was the first event in 61.7%, a recurrence in 38.3%, provoked in 50.2% and unprovoked in 49.8%. Patients not experiencing a primary outcome, or not retiring their consent will be followed up to December 31, 2024 when the final data analysis will be performedClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03428711.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.